ArticleBMC genomics2012
Comparison of metagenomic samples using sequence signatures.
Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- MerCat2: a versatileBioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Phylogeny analysis of whole protein-coding genes in metagenomic data detected an environmental gradient for the microbiota.PloS one · 2023Article
- The effect of taxonomic classification by full-length 16S rRNA sequencing with a synthetic long-read technology.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Reads Binning Improves the Assembly of Viral Genome Sequences From Metagenomic Samples.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Intrinsic laws of k-mer spectra of genome sequences and evolution mechanism of genomes.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- The Nubeam reference-free approach to analyze metagenomic sequencing reads.Genome research · 2020Article
- KmerGO: A Tool to Identify Group-Specific Sequences WithFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Classifying the Lifestyle of Metagenomically-Derived Phages Sequences Using Alignment-Free Methods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- A New Alignment-Free Whole Metagenome Comparison Tool and Its Application on Gut Microbiomes of Wild Giant Pandas.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Afann: bias adjustment for alignment-free sequence comparison based on sequencing data using neural network regression.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Reads Binning Improves Alignment-Free Metagenome Comparison.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Alignment-free genome comparison enables accurate geographic sourcing of white oak DNA.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- A Content-Based Retrieval Framework for Whole Metagenome Sequencing Samples.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Alignment-Free Sequence Analysis and Applications.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2018Article
- IdentifyingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- GePMI: A statistical model for personal intestinal microbiome identification.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2018Article
- Background Adjusted Alignment-Free Dissimilarity Measures Improve the Detection of Horizontal Gene Transfer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Alignment-free sequence comparison: benefits, applications, and tools.Genome biology · 2017Review
- Improving contig binning of metagenomic data using [Formula: see text] oligonucleotide frequency dissimilarity.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- kWIP: The k-mer weighted inner product, a de novo estimator of genetic similarity.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSequence signatures, as defined by the frequencies of k-tuples (or k-mers, k-grams), have been used extensively to compare genomic sequences of individual organisms, to identify cis-regulatory modules, and to study the evolution of regulatory sequences. Recently many next-generation sequencing (NGS) read data sets of metagenomic samples from a variety of different environments have been generated. The assembly of these reads can be difficult and analysis methods based on mapping reads to genes or pathways are also restricted by the availability and completeness of existing databases. Sequence-signature-based methods, however, do not need the complete genomes or existing databases and thus, can potentially be very useful for the comparison of metagenomic samples using NGS read data. Still, the applications of sequence signature methods for the comparison of metagenomic samples have not been well studied.
resultsWe studied several dissimilarity measures, including d2, d2* and d2S recently developed from our group, a measure (hereinafter noted as Hao) used in CVTree developed from Hao's group (Qi et al., 2004), measures based on relative di-, tri-, and tetra-nucleotide frequencies as in Willner et al. (2009), as well as standard lp measures between the frequency vectors, for the comparison of metagenomic samples using sequence signatures. We compared their performance using a series of extensive simulations and three real next-generation sequencing (NGS) metagenomic datasets: 39 fecal samples from 33 mammalian host species, 56 marine samples across the world, and 13 fecal samples from human individuals. Results showed that the dissimilarity measure d2S can achieve superior performance when comparing metagenomic samples by clustering them into different groups as well as recovering environmental gradients affecting microbial samples. New insights into the environmental factors affecting microbial compositions in metagenomic samples are obtained through the analyses. Our results show that sequence signatures of the mammalian gut are closely associated with diet and gut physiology of the mammals, and that sequence signatures of marine communities are closely related to location and temperature.
conclusionsSequence signatures can successfully reveal major group and gradient relationships among metagenomic samples from NGS reads without alignment to reference databases. The d2S dissimilarity measure is a good choice in all application scenarios. The optimal choice of tuple size depends on sequencing depth, but it is quite robust within a range of choices for moderate sequencing depths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.