Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23268583›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2013

Preconception health among women with frequent mental distress: a population-based study.

Sherry L Farr, Connie L Bish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sherry L FarrDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. sfarr@CDC.gov
Connie L Bish

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe examined the extent to which mental distress may be associated with a woman's preconception health.

methodsWe analyzed population-based, self-reported data from the 2005, 2007, and 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and limited analyses to 213,137 women aged 18-44 years. Women whose mental health was not good for ≥14 days during the past month were categorized as having frequent mental distress. For 15 preconception health indicators, we used chi-square tests to measure differences in prevalence by mental distress and the average marginal predictions approach to logistic regression to assess associations between mental distress and each preconception health indicator in separate models, adjusted for demographic characteristics. We conducted analyses using SUDAAN software to account for the complex sampling design and used weights to produce unbiased estimates.

resultsThe prevalence of good preconception health for each indicator was higher for women reporting infrequent mental distress (chi-square p value<0.001 for all). The greatest disparities in preconception health between women with infrequent and frequent mental distress, respectively, were adequate social and emotional support (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]=1.4, prevalence=83.7% and 54.8%), not smoking (aPR=1.2, 82.3% and 62.4%), adequate fruit and vegetable consumption (aPR=1.2, 26.1% and 21.5%), normal weight (aPR=1.2, 50.4% and 39.0%), and good general health (aPR=1.2, 91.7% and 71.5%).

conclusionsInterventions tailored for women with poor mental health may be needed to target specific preconception health indicators, such as social support, smoking, weight, and nutrition.

Indexed as

Health StatusHealth Status IndicatorsPreconception CareAdultBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMental DisordersMental HealthPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPrevalenceQuality Indicators, Health CareRisk FactorsSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID23268583
PMCPMC6719302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.