Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23268488›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

A sequence labeling approach to link medications and their attributes in clinical notes and clinical trial announcements for information extraction.

Qi Li, Haijun Zhai, Louise Deleger, Todd Lingren, Megan Kaiser, Laura Stoutenborough, Imre Solti

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical concept extraction: A methodology review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Electronic health records-driven phenotyping: challenges, recent advances, and perspectives.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qi LiDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Haijun Zhai
Louise Deleger
Todd Lingren
Megan Kaiser
Laura Stoutenborough
Imre Solti

Funding

Better Outcomes for Children: GWAS & PheWAS in eMERGEII.U01HG006828 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI HARLEY, JOHN BARKER, HOLM, INGRID ADELE · 2012 to 2014
$4.0M
Increasing Clinical Trial Enrollment: A Semi-Automated Patient Centered ApproachR00LM010227 · NLM · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI SOLTI, IMRE · 2010 to 2012
$727k
EHR-based patient safety: Automated error detection in neonatal intensive careR21HD072883 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI SOLTI, IMRE · 2012 to 2013
$407k
Increasing Clinical Trial Enrollment: A Semi-Automated Patient Centered ApproachK99LM010227 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOLTI, IMRE · 2009 to 2009
$84k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1U01HG006828-01NHGRI NIH HHS 3U01HG006828-01S1NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006828NICHD NIH HHS 1R21HD072883-01NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD072883NLM NIH HHS 5R00LM010227-04NLM NIH HHS K99 LM010227NLM NIH HHS R00 LM010227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this work was to evaluate machine learning methods, binary classification and sequence labeling, for medication-attribute linkage detection in two clinical corpora. DATA AND

methodsWe double annotated 3000 clinical trial announcements (CTA) and 1655 clinical notes (CN) for medication named entities and their attributes. A binary support vector machine (SVM) classification method with parsimonious feature sets, and a conditional random fields (CRF)-based multi-layered sequence labeling (MLSL) model were proposed to identify the linkages between the entities and their corresponding attributes. We evaluated the system's performance against the human-generated gold standard.

resultsThe experiments showed that the two machine learning approaches performed statistically significantly better than the baseline rule-based approach. The binary SVM classification achieved 0.94 F-measure with individual tokens as features. The SVM model trained on a parsimonious feature set achieved 0.81 F-measure for CN and 0.87 for CTA. The CRF MLSL method achieved 0.80 F-measure on both corpora. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsWe compared the novel MLSL method with a binary classification and a rule-based method. The MLSL method performed statistically significantly better than the rule-based method. However, the SVM-based binary classification method was statistically significantly better than the MLSL method for both the CTA and CN corpora. Using parsimonious feature sets both the SVM-based binary classification and CRF-based MLSL methods achieved high performance in detecting medication name and attribute linkages in CTA and CN.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMedical RecordsPharmaceutical PreparationsSupport Vector MachineClinical Trials as TopicHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPharmaceutical Preparationsattribute linkagesclinical notesclinical trial announcementsmulti-layered sequence labelingnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID23268488
PMCPMC3756265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.