Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23268487›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2013

A semantic-web oriented representation of the clinical element model for secondary use of electronic health records data.

Cui Tao, Guoqian Jiang, Thomas A Oniki, Robert R Freimuth, Qian Zhu, Deepak Sharma, Jyotishman Pathak, Stanley M Huff, Christopher G Chute

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Knowledge Graph-Enabled Cancer Data Analytics.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An information model for computable cancer phenotypes.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transformation of standardized clinical models based on OWL technologies: from CEM to OpenEHR archetypes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cui TaoBiomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. tao.cui@mayo.edu
Guoqian Jiang
Thomas A Oniki
Robert R Freimuth
Qian Zhu
Deepak Sharma
Jyotishman Pathak
Stanley M Huff
Christopher G Chute

Funding

National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical element model (CEM) is an information model designed for representing clinical information in electronic health records (EHR) systems across organizations. The current representation of CEMs does not support formal semantic definitions and therefore it is not possible to perform reasoning and consistency checking on derived models. This paper introduces our efforts to represent the CEM specification using the Web Ontology Language (OWL). The CEM-OWL representation connects the CEM content with the Semantic Web environment, which provides authoring, reasoning, and querying tools. This work may also facilitate the harmonization of the CEMs with domain knowledge represented in terminology models as well as other clinical information models such as the openEHR archetype model. We have created the CEM-OWL meta ontology based on the CEM specification. A convertor has been implemented in Java to automatically translate detailed CEMs from XML to OWL. A panel evaluation has been conducted, and the results show that the OWL modeling can faithfully represent the CEM specification and represent patient data.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsProgramming LanguagesVocabulary, ControlledHumansSemanticsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID23268487
PMCPMC3628064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.