Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23267184›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

A critical survey of methods to detect plasma membrane rafts.

Enrico Klotzsch, Gerhard J Schütz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Yeast cells actively tune their membranes to phase separate at temperatures that scale with growth temperatures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Palmitoylated Proteins in Dendritic Spine Remodeling.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enrico KlotzschInstitute of Applied Physics, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, Vienna 1040, Austria.
Gerhard J Schütz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plasma membrane is still one of the enigmatic cellular structures. Although the microscopic structure is getting clearer, not much is known about the organization at the nanometre level. Experimental difficulties have precluded unambiguous approaches, making the current picture rather fuzzy. In consequence, a variety of different membrane models has been proposed over the years, on the basis of different experimental strategies. Recent data obtained via high-resolution single-molecule microscopy shed new light on the existing hypotheses. We thus think it is a good time for reviewing the consistency of the existing models with the new data. In this paper, we summarize the available models in ten propositions, each of which is discussed critically with respect to the applied technologies and the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. Our aim is to provide the reader with a sound basis for his own assessment. We close this chapter by exposing our picture of the membrane organization at the nanoscale.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCholesterolDiffusionFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorescent DyesHeLa CellsHumansLipoylationMembrane MicrodomainsMembrane ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceSensitivity and SpecificitySphingomyelinsCholesterolFluorescent DyesMembrane ProteinsSphingomyelins

Identifiers

PMID23267184
PMCPMC3538433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.