Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23267079›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Reverse-engineering the genetic circuitry of a cancer cell with predicted intervention in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Laurent Vallat, Corey A Kemper, Nicolas Jung, Myriam Maumy-Bertrand, Frédéric Bertrand, Nicolas Meyer, Arnaud Pocheville, John W Fisher, John G Gribben, Seiamak Bahram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Personalized Drug Analysis in B Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rapid learning for precision oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2014
    Review
  14. Systems analysis of high-throughput data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laurent VallatLaboratoire d'Immunogénétique Moléculaire Humaine, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S1109, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, 67085 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Corey A Kemper
Nicolas Jung
Myriam Maumy-Bertrand
Frédéric Bertrand
Nicolas Meyer
Arnaud Pocheville
John W Fisher
John G Gribben
Seiamak Bahram

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular behavior is sustained by genetic programs that are progressively disrupted in pathological conditions--notably, cancer. High-throughput gene expression profiling has been used to infer statistical models describing these cellular programs, and development is now needed to guide orientated modulation of these systems. Here we develop a regression-based model to reverse-engineer a temporal genetic program, based on relevant patterns of gene expression after cell stimulation. This method integrates the temporal dimension of biological rewiring of genetic programs and enables the prediction of the effect of targeted gene disruption at the system level. We tested the performance accuracy of this model on synthetic data before reverse-engineering the response of primary cancer cells to a proliferative (protumorigenic) stimulation in a multistate leukemia biological model (i.e., chronic lymphocytic leukemia). To validate the ability of our method to predict the effects of gene modulation on the global program, we performed an intervention experiment on a targeted gene. Comparison of the predicted and observed gene expression changes demonstrates the possibility of predicting the effects of a perturbation in a gene regulatory network, a first step toward an orientated intervention in a cancer cell genetic program.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic EngineeringHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansLeukemia, LymphoidMicroarray AnalysisReceptors, Antigen, B-CellRegression AnalysisReverse GeneticsRNA InterferenceReceptors, Antigen, B-Cell

Identifiers

PMID23267079
PMCPMC3545767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.