Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23266797›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2013

A comparison of the scaling properties of the English, Spanish, French, and Chinese EQ-5D descriptive systems.

Nan Luo, Minghui Li, Julie Chevalier, Andrew Lloyd, Michael Herdman

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Subjects suffering from bipolar disorder taking lithium are less likely to report physical pain: a FACE-BD study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly Europeans: a secondary data analysis using SHARE(d) data.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The role of response domain and scale label in the quantitative interpretation of patient-reported outcome measure response options.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Influence of elicitation procedure and phrasing on health state valuations in experience-based time trade-off tasks among diabetes patients in China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Nan LuoSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, nan_luo@nuhs.edu.sg.
Minghui Li
Julie Chevalier
Andrew Lloyd
Michael Herdman
École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales · FRGavekal Intelligence Software (France) · FRHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the scaling properties of the English, Spanish, French, and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L descriptive systems.

methodsMembers of the general populations in the UK, Spain, France, and China were interviewed to measure the severity of health problems represented by the response labels used in the EQ-5D descriptive systems using a visual analog scale. Multiple linear regression models were used to compare the perceived label severity across the four language groups. Severity scores for labels from each EQ-5D-5L dimension scale were compared with each other to assess ordinality.

resultsEQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L labels used for describing different levels of health problems were rated differently, while those describing the same level of health problems were rated similarly. For example, the deviation of any group mean from the grand severity mean score for the label 'slight(ly)' was no larger than 5 points on a 0-100 scale for all five EQ-5D dimensions (p > 0.05 for all, t tests). Label ratings violating hypothesized ordinality of the EQ-5D-5L scales were observed in only a small proportion of respondents.

conclusionsOur study provided some preliminary evidence supporting the ordinality and equivalence of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L descriptive systems across four major languages.

Indexed as

Health StatusSickness Impact ProfileActivities of Daily LivingChinaCross-Cultural ComparisonDepressionFemaleFranceHumansInterviews as TopicLanguageLinear ModelsMalePain MeasurementPsychometricsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID23266797
OpenAlexW1965170384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.