Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23266000›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2013

A structural framework for replication origin opening by AAA+ initiation factors.

Karl E Duderstadt, James M Berger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Eukaryotic CMG Helicase at the Replication Fork: Emerging Architecture Reveals an Unexpected Mechanism.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  16. Structure and Function of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karl E DuderstadtZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
James M Berger

Funding

Mechanistic Studies of Replication Initiation in ProkaryotesR37GM071747 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI James M. Berger · 2017 to 2026
$4.4M
Structure/Function Studies of DNA Replication InitiationR01GM071747 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BERGER, JAMES M. · 2005 to 2016
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM071747NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071747NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM071747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ATP-dependent initiation factors help process replication origins and coordinate replisome assembly to control the onset of DNA synthesis. Although the specific properties and regulatory mechanisms of initiator proteins can vary greatly between different organisms, certain nucleotide-binding elements and assembly patterns appear preserved not only within the three domains of cellular life (bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes), but also with certain classes of double-stranded DNA viruses. Structural studies of replication initiation proteins, both as higher-order oligomers and in complex with cognate DNA substrates, are revealing how an evolutionarily related ATPase fold can support different modes of macromolecular assembly and function. Comparative studies between initiation systems in turn provide clues as to how duplex origin regions may be melted during initiation events.

Indexed as

Replication OriginAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaDNADNA ReplicationHumansMetalloendopeptidasesProtein BindingVirusesDNAm-AAA proteasesMetalloendopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID23266000
PMCPMC3572333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.