Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23265969›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2013

Bats and their virome: an important source of emerging viruses capable of infecting humans.

Ina Smith, Lin-Fa Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A metaanalysis of bat phylogenetics and positive selection based on genomes and transcriptomes from 18 species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bacterial Composition Across Bat Species: A Human Health Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  7. Metagenomic analysis of viral diversity in Portuguese bats.Veterinary research communications · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Bats as Hosts of Antimicrobial-ResistantVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ina SmithCSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.
Lin-Fa Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats are being increasingly recognized as an important reservoir of zoonotic viruses of different families, including SARS coronavirus, Nipah virus, Hendra virus and Ebola virus. Several recent studies hypothesized that bats, an ancient group of flying mammals, are the major reservoir of several important RNA virus families from which other mammalian viruses of livestock and humans were derived. Although this hypothesis needs further investigation, the premise that bats carry a large number of viruses is commonly accepted. The question of whether bats have unique biological features making them ideal reservoir hosts has been the subject of several recent reviews. In this review, we will focus on the public health implications of bat derived zoonotic viral disease outbreaks, examine the drivers and risk factors of past disease outbreaks and outline research directions for better control of future disease events.

Indexed as

Disease ReservoirsAnimalsChiropteraDisease OutbreaksEbolavirusHendra VirusHumansLivestockMammalsNipah VirusSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusVirus DiseasesVirusesZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID23265969
PMCPMC7102720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.