ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2013
Ipilimumab in prostate cancer.
Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subtype and prognostic analysis of immunogenic cell death-related gene signature in prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- γδ T cells for cancer immunotherapy: A systematic review of clinical trials.Oncoimmunology · 2014Review
- Next-generation cancer vaccine approaches: integrating lessons learned from current successes with promising biotechnologic advances.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2013Review
- Update on the challenges and recent advances in cancer immunotherapy.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors, such as ipilimumab , are a new class of immunotherapeutic agents that have shown significant efficacy in melanoma. A number of ongoing clinical trials are investigating the role of ipilimumab in prostate cancer, either alone or in combination with immunomodulating agents such as radiation and chemotherapy, and in combination with cancer vaccines. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the molecular basis, preclinical and clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab in prostate cancer. Medical literature search using MEDLINE and online abstracts database of national meetings form the basis of this article. EXPERT OPINION: A number of preliminary clinical studies suggest the potential therapeutic utility of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab in prostate cancer. Pending the results of large-scale studies, the rationale of combining ipilimumab with standard anticancer therapeutics such as radiation, cytotoxic chemotherapy and other immunotherapeutic agents can be of great value in reducing mortality and morbidity in prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.