Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23265371›Full record

ReviewPathogens and global health2012

A review on camel brucellosis: a zoonosis sustained by ignorance and indifference.

Lisa D Sprague, Sascha Al-Dahouk, Heinrich Neubauer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens and global health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exposure toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Infectious disease reports · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Bovine brucellosis - a comprehensive review.The veterinary quarterly · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa D SpragueFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany. natter13@gmx.de
Sascha Al-Dahouk
Heinrich Neubauer
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEFederal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many developing countries of Asia and Africa, camels are one of the most important sources of income for the nomadic population. With increasing urbanization, camel milk and meat have gained a wider market and commercialization and consumption of camel products are on the rise. Camel brucellosis can be encountered in all camel rearing countries with exception of Australia. High animal and herd prevalences have been reported from numerous countries, which not only pose a continuous risk for human infection, but also increase the spread of infection through uncontrolled trade of clinically inconspicuous animals. This short review aims at providing an overview on diagnostic investigations, as well as the public health and economic impact of brucellosis in old world camels.

Indexed as

CamelusAfricaAnimalsAsiaBrucellosisFoodborne DiseasesHumansPrevalenceZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID23265371
PMCPMC4001573
OpenAlexW2023889471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.