Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23265239›Full record

ArticleVeterinary microbiology2013

Modulation of chemokine and chemokine receptor expression following infection of porcine macrophages with African swine fever virus.

Emma Fishbourne, Charles C Abrams, Haru-H Takamatsu, Linda K Dixon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transcriptome view of a killer: African swine fever virus.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma FishbourneThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
Charles C AbramsThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
Haru-H TakamatsuThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
Linda K DixonThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK. Electronic address: Linda.dixon@pirbrightac.uk.
The Pirbright Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00001003Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00001709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is the only member of the Asfarviridae, a large DNA virus family which replicates predominantly in the cytoplasm. Most isolates cause a fatal haemorrhagic disease in domestic pigs, although some low virulence isolates cause little or no mortality. The modulation of chemokine responses following infection of porcine macrophages with low and high virulence isolates was studied to indicate how this may be involved in the induction of pathogenesis and of effective immune responses. Infection with both low and high virulence isolates resulted in down-regulation of mRNA levels for chemokines CCL2, CCL3L, CXCL2 and chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR5, CXCR3, CXCR4 and up-regulation in expression of mRNAs for CCL4, CXCL10 and chemokine receptor CCR7. Levels of CCL4, CXCL8, CXCL10 mRNAs were higher in macrophages infected with low virulence isolate OURT88/3 compared to high virulence isolate Benin 97/1. Levels of CXCL8 and CCL2 protein were significantly reduced in supernatants from macrophages infected with Benin 97/1 isolate compared to OURT88/3 and mock-infected macrophages. There was also a decreased chemotactic response of donor cells exposed to supernatants from Benin 97/1 infected macrophages compared to those from OURT88/3 and mock-infected macrophages. The data show that infection of macrophages with the low virulence strain OURT88/3 induces higher expression of key inflammatory chemokines compared to infection with high virulence strain Benin 97/1. This may be important for the induction of effective protective immunity that has been observed in pigs immunised with the OURT88/3 isolate.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsChemokinesGene Expression RegulationMacrophagesReceptors, ChemokineRNA, MessengerSus scrofaSwineVirulenceChemokinesReceptors, ChemokineRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID23265239
PMCPMC3605585
OpenAlexW2059031093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.