Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23265076›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2012

Effectiveness of a group diabetes education programme in underserved communities in South Africa: pragmatic cluster randomized control trial.

Bob Mash, Naomi Levitt, Krisela Steyn, Merrick Zwarenstein, Stephen Rollnick

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Evaluating the implementation of group empowerment for people with type 2 diabetes at Grassy Park Community Day Centre, Cape Town: A convergent mixed-methods study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The sustainability of group empowerment and training for people with diabetes in South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Comprehensive patient education and counselling for non-communicable diseases in primary care, Western Cape.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  11. Piloting of virtual group education for diabetes in Cape Town: An exploratory qualitative study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. African Primary Care Research: quantitative analysis and presentation of results.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bob MashFamily Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, Box 19063, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa. rm@sun.ac.za
Naomi Levitt
Krisela Steyn
Merrick Zwarenstein
Stephen Rollnick

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is an important contributor to the burden of disease in South Africa and prevalence rates as high as 33% have been recorded in Cape Town. Previous studies show that quality of care and health outcomes are poor. The development of an effective education programme should impact on self-care, lifestyle change and adherence to medication; and lead to better control of diabetes, fewer complications and better quality of life.

methodsTRIAL

designPragmatic cluster randomized controlled trialParticipants: Type 2 diabetic patients attending 45 public sector community health centres in Cape TownInterventions: The intervention group will receive 4 sessions of group diabetes education delivered by a health promotion officer in a guiding style. The control group will receive usual care which consists of ad hoc advice during consultations and occasional educational talks in the waiting room.

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the group diabetes education programmeOutcomes: PRIMARY OUTCOMES: diabetes self-care activities, 5% weight loss, 1% reduction in HbA1c. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: self-efficacy, locus of control, mean blood pressure, mean weight loss, mean waist circumference, mean HbA1c, mean total cholesterol, quality of lifeRandomisation: Computer generated random numbersBlinding: Patients, health promoters and research assistants could not be blinded to the health centre's allocationNumbers randomized: Seventeen health centres (34 in total) will be randomly assigned to either control or intervention groups. A sample size of 1360 patients in 34 clusters of 40 patients will give a power of 80% to detect the primary outcomes with 5% precision. Altogether 720 patients were recruited in the intervention arm and 850 in the control arm giving a total of 1570. DISCUSSION: The study will inform policy makers and managers of the district health system, particularly in low to middle income countries, if this programme can be implemented more widely. TRIAL REGISTER: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR201205000380384.

Indexed as

Medically Underserved AreaSelf CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycated HemoglobinHumansMotivational InterviewingOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicProgram EvaluationSelf EfficacySouth AfricaWeight LossGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23265076
PMCPMC3560091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.