ArticleOncoimmunology2012
Inefficient boosting of antitumor CD8(+) T cells by dendritic-cell vaccines is rescued by restricting T-cell cytotoxic functions.
Article in Oncoimmunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human IP10-scFv and DC-induced CTL synergistically inhibit the growth of glioma in a xenograft model.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Article
- Functional OCT4-specific CD4Oncoimmunology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) are powerful activators of primary and secondary immune responses and have promising activity as anticancer vaccines. However, various populations of immune cells, including natural killer cells, regulatory T cells and especially cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), can inhibit DC function through cytotoxic clearance. Spontaneous tumor-specific CTL responses are frequently observed in patients before immunotherapy, and it is unclear how such pre-existing responses may affect DC vaccines. We used an adoptive transfer model to show that DC vaccination fail to induce the expansion of pre-existing CTLs or increase their production of interferon γ (IFNγ). The expansion and effector differentiation of naïve host CD8(+) T cells was also suppressed in the presence of CTLs of the same specificity. Suppression was caused by the cytotoxic functions of the adoptively transferred CTLs, as perforin-deficient CTLs could respond to DC vaccination by expanding and increasing IFNγ production. Proliferation and effector differentiation of host CD8(+) T cells as well as resistance to tumor challenge were also significantly increased. Expression of perforin by antitumor CTLs was critical in regulating the survival of vaccine DCs, while FAS/FASL and TRAIL/DR5 had a significant, but comparatively smaller, effect. We conclude that perforin-expressing CTLs can suppress the activity of DC-based vaccines and prevent the expansion of naïve and memory CD8(+) T cells as well as antitumor immune responses. We suggest that, paradoxically, temporarily blocking the cytotoxic functions of CTLs at the time of DC vaccination should result in improved vaccine efficiency and enhanced antitumor immunity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.