Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23264346›Full record

ArticleRadiology2013

Immune rejection after pancreatic islet cell transplantation: in vivo dual contrast-enhanced MR imaging in a mouse model.

Ping Wang, Christian Schuetz, Alana Ross, Guangping Dai, James F Markmann, Anna Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Polymeric Scaffolds for Pancreatic Tissue Engineering: A Review.The review of diabetic studies : RDS · 2018
    Review
  7. Islet cell transplant: Update on current clinical trials.Current transplantation reports · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ping WangMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Building 75, 149 13th St, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Christian Schuetz
Alana Ross
Guangping Dai
James F Markmann
Anna Moore

Funding

Mechanisms of B Cell-Dependent Transplantation ToleranceR01AI057851 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JAMES FRANCIS MARKMANN · 2006 to 2026
$8.9M
In-Vivo Imaging of Islet TransplantationR01DK072137 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOORE, ANNA · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI057851NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072137NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK072137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo detect adoptively transferred immune attack in a mouse model of islet cell transplantation by using a long-circulating paramagnetic T1 contrast agent, a protected graft copolymer (PGC) that is covalently linked to gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid with fluorescein isothiocyanate (Gd-DTPA-F), which accumulates in the sites of inflammation that are characterized by vascular disruption. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll animal experiments were performed in compliance with institutional guidelines and approved by the subcommittee on research animal care. Six nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency mice received transplanted human islet cells under the kidney capsule and adoptively transferred 5 × 10(6) splenocytes from 6-week-old nonobese diabetic mice. These mice also served as control subjects for comparison of pre- and postadoptive transfer MR imaging results. Mice that received phosphate-buffered saline solution only were included as nonadoptive-transfer control subjects (n = 2). In vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed before and 17 hours after intravenous injections of PGC-Gd-DTPA-F, followed by histologic examination. Statistical differences were analyzed by means of a paired Student t test and repeated two-way analysis of variance.

resultsMR imaging results showed significantly greater accumulation of PGC-Gd-DTPA-F in the graft area after immune attack initiated by adoptive transfer of splenocytes compared with that of the same area before the transfer (T1, 137.2 msec ± 39.3 and 239.5 msec ± 17.6, respectively; P < .001). These results were confirmed at histologic examination, which showed considerable leakage of the contrast agent into the islet cell interstitium.

conclusionPGC-Gd-DTPA-F-enhanced MR imaging allows for the in vivo assessment of vascular damage of the graft T cell challenge.

Indexed as

DextransGadolinium DTPAAnimalsCells, CulturedContrast MediaDiabetes MellitusFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateGraft RejectionHumansIslets of Langerhans TransplantationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaDextransFluorescein-5-isothiocyanatefluorescein isothiocyanate dextranGadolinium DTPA

Identifiers

PMID23264346
PMCPMC3579171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.