Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23263637›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2013

Efficacy and safety of Echinaforce® in respiratory tract infections.

Andreas Schapowal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Latin American Plants against Microorganisms.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  2. COVID-19 Therapeutic Potential of Natural Products.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  6. CanHeliyon · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of UV irradiation onMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andreas SchapowalAllergy Clinic, Hochwangstr. 3, 7302 Landquart, Switzerland. andreas@schapowal.ch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echinaforce® is the standardised extract of Echinacea purpurea from Bioforce, Switzerland. Recent studies show immunomodulation and broad antiviral effects against respiratory tract viruses. Haemagglutinin and Neuraminidase are blocked. In contrast to Oseltamivir no resistance is caused by Echinaforce®. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study over four months confirms that Echinaforce® supports the immune resistance and acts directly against a series of viruses. Echinaforce® is efficacious and safe in respiratory tract infections for long-term and short-term prevention as well as for acute treatment.

Indexed as

EchinaceaPhytotherapyAntiviral AgentsCommon ColdDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunologic FactorsInfluenza, HumanPlant ExtractsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Tract InfectionsAntiviral AgentsEchinaforceImmunologic FactorsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID23263637
PMCPMC7088131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.