Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23263624›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2013

Impact of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) using the photosensitizer chlorin e6 on viability, apoptosis, and proliferation of human corneal endothelial cells.

Jiong Wang, Tanja Stachon, Timo Eppig, Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz, Nóra Szentmáry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) using the photosensitizer chlorin e6 on viability, apoptosis, and proliferation of human keratocytes in vitro.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2013
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Jiong WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str 1, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. jiong_wang@live.com
Tanja Stachon
Timo Eppig
Achim Langenbucher
Berthold Seitz
Nóra Szentmáry
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhotodynamic inactivation (PDI) may be a potential alternative in case of therapy-resistant infectious keratitis. PDI using the photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) with high photosensitizing efficacy offers a valuable option, also for keratitis. The purpose of our study was to determine the impact of PDI with the photosensitizer Ce6 on viability, apoptosis, and proliferation of human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs), in vitro.

methodsHuman corneal endothelial cell line was cultured in DMEM/Ham's F12 medium supplemented with 5 % fetal calf serum. HCECs cultures underwent illumination using red (670 nm) light for 13 min following exposure to 50-500 nM concentrations of Ce6 in the culture medium. Twenty-four hours after PDI, cell viability was evaluated by the Alamar blue assay, total DNA content of the cells and apoptosis using the APO-DIRECT Kit, and cell proliferation by the BrdU Cell Proliferation Assay Kit.

resultsUsing Ce6 or illumination only, we did not detect significant changes of cell viability, apoptosis, and proliferation. Following PDI, viability and total DNA content of HCECs decreased significantly above 150 nM Ce6 concentration (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). The percentage of apoptotic HCECs increased significantly from 250 nM Ce6 concentration (P < 0.01), and proliferation of endothelial cells decreased significantly (P < 0.05) above 100 nM concentration of Ce6 after PDI.

conclusionsPhotodynamic inactivation using Ce6 decreases viability and proliferation, and also triggers apoptosis of HCECs in vitro. PDI using the photosensitizer Ce6 may be a potential treatment alternative in infectious keratitis. However, to avoid endothelial cell damage, the photosensitizer must not penetrate the endothelium.

Indexed as

PhotochemotherapyApoptosisCell CountCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalChlorophyllidesColoring AgentsDNA ReplicationEndothelium, CornealFlow CytometryHumansMicroscopy, FluorescencePhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsPropidiumChlorophyllidesColoring AgentsPhotosensitizing AgentsphytochlorinPorphyrinsPropidium

Identifiers

PMID23263624
OpenAlexW2021265502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.