Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23263379›Full record

ReviewNature cell biology2013

p53 mutations in cancer.

Patricia A J Muller, Karen H Vousden

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 991 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
991citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

991 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of TP53 somatic mutations on prognosis in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Mutant p53Molecular oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The p53 Isoforms as Potential Biomarkers in Different Cancer Entities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Reactivation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

931 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patricia A J MullerThe Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1BD, UK.
Karen H Vousden

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past fifteen years, it has become apparent that tumour-associated p53 mutations can provoke activities that are different to those resulting from simply loss of wild-type tumour-suppressing p53 function. Many of these mutant p53 proteins acquire oncogenic properties that enable them to promote invasion, metastasis, proliferation and cell survival. Here we highlight some of the emerging molecular mechanisms through which mutant p53 proteins can exert these oncogenic functions.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMutant ProteinsNeoplasmsProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor ProteinsMutant ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTP63 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23263379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.