Humans put their eggs in more than one basket.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Environmentally induced epigenetic toxicity: potential public health concerns.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2016
   Review
2. Methylation and transcripts expression at the imprinted GNAS locus in human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives.Stem cell reports · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The ontogeny of cKIT+ human primordial germ cells proves to be a resource for human germ line reprogramming, imprint erasure and in vitro differentiation.2013
• Erratum issued

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as