Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23263289›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2013

Oncology drug development and approval of systemic anticancer therapy by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Robert E Martell, David Sermer, Kenneth Getz, Kenneth I Kaitin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review of Clinical Equipoise: Examples from Oncology Trials.Current reviews in clinical and experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  3. Clinical endpoints in oncology - a primer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Local Control and Toxicity of External Beam Reirradiation With a Pulsed Low-dose-rate Technique.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert E MartellDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, USA. RMartell@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
David Sermer
Kenneth Getz
Kenneth I Kaitin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegulatory approval of oncology drugs is the cornerstone of the development process and approval characteristics shape eventual utilization. Approval trends and characteristics provide valuable information for drug developers and regulators and ultimately affect clinicians and patients.

methodsIndication characteristics were tabulated for drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for systemic therapy of malignancies from 1949 through October 2011. Variables included time to approval, initial/supplemental indication, tumor type, stage of disease, specification of protein expression or genetic information, drug class, trial design, concomitant agent, trial size, and endpoint.

resultsA total of 121 unique anticancer agents, including 242 unique indications, were approved. The number of trials for each indication has decreased; however, trial size has increased and more randomized controlled trials have been performed. Trial designs have increasingly used time-to-event endpoints and rarely have used symptom-based primary endpoints. Approvals have been primarily single agent, with less emphasis on palliative treatments and increasing emphasis on advanced disease stages and requirements for prior therapy. Molecular specifications in labels have increased, but they are present in less than 30% of recent indications and are not associated with shorter approval times.

conclusionApproval of oncology agents is occurring in increasingly more challenging settings, suggesting gaps between eventual practice and development in potentially suboptimal indications. Molecular specifications promise to enhance development, yet widespread use in label indications has not yet been achieved.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnticarcinogenic AgentsDrug ApprovalHumansNeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAnticarcinogenic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23263289
PMCPMC3556246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.