ArticleHerz2013
Fungal endocarditis of a bioprosthetic aortic valve. Pharmacological treatment of a Candida parapsilosis endocarditis.
Article in Herz, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fungal Endocarditis: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Candida parapsilosis prosthetic valve endocarditis.Medical mycology case reports · 2015Article
- Recurrent candida prosthetic endocarditis over fifteen years managed with medical therapy and four valvular surgeries: a case report and review of literature.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2015Review
- Imaging fungal infections in children.Clinical and translational imagingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn October 2011, a 72-year-old man was referred from a peripheral hospital with subsequent diagnosis: fungal sepsis with suspicion for endocarditis of a bioprosthetic aortic heart valve. In May 2010, a bioprosthetic aortic valve implantation (Edwards Magna) and CABG (LIMA graft on LAD) were performed. CASE: At the time of admission, the patient was in good general condition; the physical examination was unremarkable. Hemoculture detected Streptococci thermophilus and Candida parapsilosis. Neither an oscillating intracardiac mass on the valve nor an abscess could be detected in several transesophageal echocardiographies (TEEs). The F(18)-FDG PET-CT showed an increased tracer uptake in the area of the prosthetic aortic valve. The findings argued for a fungal endocarditis of the prosthetic aortic valve. Heart surgeons refrained from implantation of a new prosthetic aortic valve because of the unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, high-dose i.v. therapy with liposomale amphotericin B (5 mg/kg BW) and voriconazol (4 mg/kg BW twice a day) was started. A new F(18)-FDG PET-CT after 2 weeks showed no tracer uptake in the area of the prosthetic aortic valve. The hemoculture was also negative. The patient recovered; CRP values were within normal limits. Life-long antifungal therapy with fluconazol (400 mg/day) was recommended.
conclusionThere are no definitive treatment recommendations for fungal endocarditis. Surgical therapy is the first choice in prosthetic valve endocarditis, which however cannot be performed in all patients. In these cases high dose and life-long medical therapy is necessary to prevent re-infection of the valve, even if (transient) deterioration of renal and liver function occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.