ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2013
Recombinant GroEL enhances protective antigen-mediated protection against Bacillus anthracis spore challenge.
Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A putative exosporium lipoprotein GBAA0190 of Bacillus anthracis as a potential anthrax vaccine candidate.BMC immunology · 2021Article
- Molecular and Genomic Characterization of PFAB2: A Non-virulentCurrent genomics · 2019Article
- GroEL Mediates Folding ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2018Article
- A bivalent protein r-PB, comprising PA and BclA immunodominant regions for comprehensive protection against Bacillus anthracis.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Ser/Thr protein kinase PrkC-mediated regulation of GroEL is critical for biofilm formation inNPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fatal inhalation infection caused by Bacillus anthracis results from a complex pathogenic cycle involving release of toxins by bacteria that germinate from spores. Currently available vaccines against anthrax consist of protective antigen (PA), one of the anthrax toxin components. However, these PA-based vaccines are only partially protective against spore challenge in mice. This shows that exclusive elicitation of high anti-PA titer does not directly correlate with protection. Here, we demonstrate that inclusion of GroEL of B. anthracis with PA elicits enhanced protection against anthrax spore challenge in mice. GroEL was included as it has been reported to be present both on the exosporium and in the secretome in addition to the cell surface of B. anthracis. It has also been found protective against other pathogens. In the present study, immunization with GroEL alone was also potent enough to induce high humoral and cell-mediated response and significantly prolonged the mean time to death in spore-challenged mice. As a surface antigen, opsonization of spores with anti-GroEL IgG showed increased uptake of treated spores and therefore accelerated rate of spore destruction by phagocytic cells leading to the protection of mice. We found that GroEL was able to enhance nitric oxide release from lymphocytes and also reduce bacterial load from the organs, probably through the activation of macrophages and over-expression of certain innate immunity receptors. Therefore, the present study emphasizes that GroEL is an effective immunomodulator against B. anthracis infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.