Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23262934›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2013

Prevalence, trends, and patterns of use of antidiabetic medications among pregnant women, 2001-2007.

Jean M Lawrence, Susan E Andrade, Lyndsay A Avalos, Sarah J Beaton, Vicki Y Chiu, Robert L Davis, Sascha Dublin, Pamala A Pawloski, Marsha A Raebel, David H Smith and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chinese medicine as complementary therapy for female infertility.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Perinatal outcomes in type 2 diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean M LawrenceDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California 91101, USA. Jean.M.Lawrence@kp.org
Susan E Andrade
Lyndsay A Avalos
Sarah J Beaton
Vicki Y Chiu
Robert L Davis
Sascha Dublin
Pamala A Pawloski
Marsha A Raebel
David H Smith
Sengwee Toh
Jean Q Wang
Sigal Kaplan
Thushi Amini
Christian Hampp
Tarek A Hammad
Pamela E Scott
T Craig Cheetham
Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program (MEPREP) Study Group
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Pharmacepidemiology in the elderly: medications pneumonia risk and confoundingK23AG028954 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI DUBLIN, SASCHA · 2007 to 2011
$864k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028954NIA NIH HHS K23AG028954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the prevalence, trends, and patterns in use of antidiabetic medications to treat hyperglycemia and insulin resistance before and during pregnancy in a large U.S. cohort of insured pregnant women.

methodsPregnancies resulting in live births were identified (N=437,950) from 2001 to 2007 among 372,543 females 12-50 years of age at delivery from 10 health maintenance organizations participating in the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program. Information for these descriptive analyses, including all antidiabetic medications dispensed during this period, was extracted from electronic health records and newborn birth certificates.

resultsA little more than 1% (1.21%) of deliveries were to women dispensed antidiabetic medication in the 120 days before pregnancy. Use of antidiabetic medications before pregnancy increased from 0.66% of deliveries in 2001 to 1.66% of deliveries in 2007 (P<.001) because of an increase in metformin use. Most women using metformin before pregnancy had a diagnosis code for polycystic ovaries or female infertility (67.2%), whereas only 13.6% had a diagnosis code for diabetes. The use of antidiabetic medications during the second or third trimester of pregnancy increased from 2.8% of deliveries in 2001 to 3.6% in 2007 (P<.001). Approximately two thirds (68%) of women using metformin before pregnancy did not use any antidiabetic medications during pregnancy.

conclusionsAntidiabetic medication use before and during pregnancy increased from 2001 to 2007, possibly because of increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and other conditions associated with insulin resistance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAdolescentAdultChildDiabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInfant, NewbornInfertility, FemaleMetforminMiddle AgedPolycystic Ovary SyndromePregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondHypoglycemic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID23262934
PMCPMC3811068
OpenAlexW1549537644

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.