ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2013
CT quantification of hemoperitoneum volume in abdominal haemorrhage: a new method.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative aggressive diuresis prevents postoperative tissue edema and complications in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Postoperative Visceral Tissue Edema Assessed by Computed Tomography Is a Predictor for Severe Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018Article
- Quantification of interstitial fluid on whole body CT: comparison with whole body autopsy.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn emergency departments, focused assessment for sonographic examination of trauma patients (FAST) accurately detects hemoperitoneum in unstable patients. Currently, only an approximation of the volume of free intraperitoneal fluid (FIPF) can be done using ultrasound (US) and CT scans. We previously reported a new method developed on an experimental cadaveric model using US examination of the abdomen and applying a mathematic formula to effusion measurements to evaluate the exact volume of FIPF. The aim of this prospective study is to extrapolate this method in a clinical practice and apply it to CT measurements of the same area. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe included prospectively eleven patients admitted with acute intraperitoneal haemorrhage: 10 patients with post-traumatic hemoperitoneum and 1 patient with a ruptured extra-uterine pregnancy. The mean age was 43.2 years (extremes: 21-82). There were six males and five females. All of these patients had to undergo emergency surgery by laparotomy or laparoscopy. The amount of FIPF was assessed preoperatively on axial sections of CT scan, by measuring fluid thickness in millimetres in the hepatorenal pouch (Morrison's pouch), between the inferior aspect of the liver and the anterior aspect of the right kidney. During the emergency surgical procedure, we collected and quantified FIPF volume by direct measure in all cases.
resultsThe correlation between fluid thickness x (mm) on the CT scan and the estimated amount of FIPF was established by the following linear function: volume (mL) = 81.068x + 263.2. The Spearman's R obtained is 0.779 and the significance level is 0.005. We found a constant correlation between FIPF measured by radiologic procedure and direct per-operative measurement of FIPF.
conclusionThis new linear function can be used to measure the exact volume of FIPF. This evaluation can help surgical decisions, especially when abdominal trauma is associated with other haemorrhagic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23262556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.