Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23262151›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2012

The role of uncertainty and reward on eye movements in a virtual driving task.

Brian T Sullivan, Leif Johnson, Constantin A Rothkopf, Dana Ballard, Mary Hayhoe

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Just-in-time: Gaze guidance in natural behavior.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Search strategies improve with practice, but not with time pressure or financial incentives.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian T SullivanSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA. brians@ski.org
Leif Johnson
Constantin A Rothkopf
Dana Ballard
Mary Hayhoe

Funding

VISUAL SENSITIVITY REGULATION &COLOR CODINGR01EY005729 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HAYHOE, MARY M · 1985 to 2023
$7.0M
Neural Models of BehaviorR01EY019174 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BALLARD, DANA H. · 2009 to 2011
$974k
NEI NIH HHS EY019174NEI NIH HHS EY05729NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005729NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye movements during natural tasks are well coordinated with ongoing task demands and many variables could influence gaze strategies. Sprague and Ballard (2003) proposed a gaze-scheduling model that uses a utility-weighted uncertainty metric to prioritize fixations on task-relevant objects and predicted that human gaze should be influenced by both reward structure and task-relevant uncertainties. To test this conjecture, we tracked the eye movements of participants in a simulated driving task where uncertainty and implicit reward (via task priority) were varied. Participants were instructed to simultaneously perform a Follow Task where they followed a lead car at a specific distance and a Speed Task where they drove at an exact speed. We varied implicit reward by instructing the participants to emphasize one task over the other and varied uncertainty in the Speed Task with the presence or absence of uniform noise added to the car's velocity. Subjects' gaze data were classified for the image content near fixation and segmented into looks. Gaze measures, including look proportion, duration and interlook interval, showed that drivers more closely monitor the speedometer if it had a high level of uncertainty, but only if it was also associated with high task priority or implicit reward. The interaction observed appears to be an example of a simple mechanism whereby the reduction of visual uncertainty is gated by behavioral relevance. This lends qualitative support for the primary variables controlling gaze allocation proposed in the Sprague and Ballard model.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationUncertaintyAdultAutomobile DrivingEye MovementsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMalePsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID23262151
PMCPMC3587015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.