ArticleCirculation2013
A systems approach to designing effective clinical trials using simulations.
Article in Circulation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the state-of-the-art of the barriers for personalized preventive approaches worldwide: A scoping review of reviews.PloS one · 2025Article
- Approximating Functions with Approximate Privacy for Applications in Signal Estimation and Learning.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Optimizing the dynamic treatment regime of in-hospital warfarin anticoagulation in patients after surgical valve replacement using reinforcement learning.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Personalized Anticoagulation: Optimizing Warfarin Management Using Genetics and Simulated Clinical Trials.Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics · 2017Article
- Leaping the Data Chasm: Structuring Donation of Clinical Data for Healthcare Innovation and Modeling.Harvard health policy review : a student publication of the Harvard Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy · 2015Article
- Privacy in Pharmacogenetics: An End-to-End Case Study of Personalized Warfarin Dosing.Proceedings of the ... USENIX Security Symposium. UNIX Security Symposium · 2014Article
- Next generation phenotyping using the unified medical language system.JMIR medical informatics · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPharmacogenetics in warfarin clinical trials have failed to show a significant benefit in comparison with standard clinical therapy. This study demonstrates a computational framework to systematically evaluate preclinical trial design of target population, pharmacogenetic algorithms, and dosing protocols to optimize primary outcomes. METHODS AND
resultsWe programmatically created an end-to-end framework that systematically evaluates warfarin clinical trial designs. The framework includes options to create a patient population, multiple dosing strategies including genetic-based and nongenetic clinical-based, multiple-dose adjustment protocols, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics modeling and international normalization ratio prediction, and various types of outcome measures. We validated the framework by conducting 1000 simulations of the applying pharmacogenetic algorithms to individualize dosing of warfarin (CoumaGen) clinical trial primary end points. The simulation predicted a mean time in therapeutic range of 70.6% and 72.2% (P=0.47) in the standard and pharmacogenetic arms, respectively. Then, we evaluated another dosing protocol under the same original conditions and found a significant difference in the time in therapeutic range between the pharmacogenetic and standard arm (78.8% versus 73.8%; P=0.0065), respectively.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that this simulation framework is useful in the preclinical assessment phase to study and evaluate design options and provide evidence to optimize the clinical trial for patient efficacy and reduced risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.