Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23261789›Full record

Trial reportInfant behavior & development2013

The paradox of prematurity: the behavioral vulnerability of late preterm infants and the cognitive susceptibility of very preterm infants at 36 months post-term.

Prachi E Shah, Natashia Robbins, Renuka B Coelho, Julie Poehlmann

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Infant behavior & development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prachi E ShahCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. prachis@umich.edu
Natashia Robbins
Renuka B Coelho
Julie Poehlmann

Funding

WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MAILICK, MARSHA RUTH · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
Baylor Mentored Clinical Investigator AwardK12RR017665 · NCRR · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HAYMOND, MOREY W · 2002 to 2006
$5.3M
Baylor CHRC: Pediatrics Mentored Research ProgramK12HD041648 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KLINE, MARK · 2002 to 2011
$4.2M
The Development of Self-regulation in High Risk InfantsR01HD044163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POEHLMANN-TYNAN, JULIE A · 2004 to 2008
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS K12 RR017665NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD041648NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD047839NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD03352NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044163NICHD NIH HHS R01HD44163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored associations among preterm status (very preterm infant (VPI: <30 weeks), moderate preterm (MPI: 30-33(6/7) weeks), late preterm (LPI: 34-36(6/7) weeks), parenting, and 3-year cognitive and behavioral outcomes. We hypothesized that LPIs would demonstrate better health and neurobehavioral outcomes compared with more premature infants, and that preterm status would moderate the association between parenting quality and 3-year outcomes. Sample included 123 preterm infants (gestation <37 weeks) and their mothers from a larger study of high-risk infants with measures of neonatal and socioeconomic risks at hospital discharge; maternal vocabulary at 9-months, child IQ and behavior at 36 months, and maternal depressive symptoms and parenting at all timepoints. Group differences were explored using MANOVAs while predictors of child outcomes were explored using hierarchical regression analyses. MANOVAs indicated that LPIs had more optimal neonatal health during the hospital stay, yet more externalizing (p=.043), aggressive (p=.006) and oppositional behaviors (p=.008) at 3 years compared with VPIs. There were no IQ differences between VPIs, MPIs and LPIs. However, preterm infants who experienced less negative parenting had higher IQs at 36 months (β=-3.245, p=.017), with the greatest effects seen in VPIs (β=0.406, p=.01) compared with LPIs (β=0.148, p=.381). LPIs manifested similar IQ, but more externalizing, oppositional and aggressive behavior symptoms compared to VPIs. VPIs appeared to be differentially susceptible to parenting effects, with VPIs demonstrating the highest cognitive scores in the context of more positive parenting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsChild DevelopmentCognitionFemaleHumansInfantInfant BehaviorInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLongitudinal StudiesMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23261789
PMCPMC4235990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.