Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23260994›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2013

Institutional prevention policies and rates of Group B Streptococcus infection among HIV-infected pregnant women and their infants in Latin America.

Esaú Joao, Maria I Gouvea, Laura Freimanis-Hance, Rachel A Cohen, Jennifer S Read, Victor Melo, Geraldo Duarte, Silvina Ivalo, Daisy M Machado, Jose Pilotto and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Esaú JoaoServiço de Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. esaujoao@gmail.com
Maria I Gouvea
Laura Freimanis-Hance
Rachel A Cohen
Jennifer S Read
Victor Melo
Geraldo Duarte
Silvina Ivalo
Daisy M Machado
Jose Pilotto
George K Siberry
NISDI/LILAC Protocol
Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado · BRWestat (United States) · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital Ramos Mejía · ARNational Institutes of Health · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Iguaçu · BR

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200800001CNICHD NIH HHS N01-HD-8-0001NIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200800001CNIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200800001G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe Group B Streptococcus (GBS) prevention policies at 12 Latin American sites participating in the NICHD (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) International Site Development Initiative (NISDI) Longitudinal Study in Latin American Countries (LILAC) and to determine rates of rectovaginal colonization and GBS-related disease among HIV-infected pregnant women and their infants.

methodsSite surveys were used to assess prevention policies and practices administered cross-sectionally during 2010. Data collected in NISDI from 2008 to 2010 regarding HIV-infected pregnant women were used to determine rates of colonization and GBS-related disease.

resultsOf the 9 sites with a GBS prevention policy, 7 performed routine rectovaginal screening for GBS. Of the 401 women included in the NISDI study, 56.9% were at sites that screened. The GBS colonization rate was 8.3% (19/228 women; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%-12.7%). Disease related to GBS occurred in 0.5% of the participants (2/401 women; 95% CI, 0.1%-1.8%); however, no GBS-related disease was reported among the 398 infants (95% CI, 0.0%-0.9%).

conclusionImproved efforts to implement prevention policies and continued surveillance for GBS are needed to understand the impact of GBS among HIV-infected pregnant women and their infants in Latin America.

Indexed as

Streptococcus agalactiaeCoinfectionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfant, NewbornLatin AmericaLongitudinal StudiesMass ScreeningOrganizational PolicyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousStreptococcal Infections

Identifiers

PMID23260994
PMCPMC3553316
OpenAlexW1981792822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.