Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23260838›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2013

With pills, patches, rings, and shots: who still uses condoms? A longitudinal cohort study.

Rachel L Goldstein, Ushma D Upadhyay, Tina R Raine

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel L GoldsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Ushma D Upadhyay
Tina R Raine
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Clinical and Transtional Science InstituteTL1RR024129 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$2.0M
Combined Hormonal Contraceptive Use in High Risk WomenR01HD045480 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RAINE-BENNETT, TINA RENEE · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
Improving Contraceptive Use in High-Risk WomenK24HD057086 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RAINE-BENNETT, TINA RENEE · 2009 to 2013
$743k
NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR024129NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD057086NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD057086-02NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe women's condom use patterns over time and assess predictors of dual method use 12 months after initiating hormonal contraceptives.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study among women aged 15-24 years initiating oral contraceptive pills, patch, ring, or depot medroxyprogesterone and attending public family planning clinics. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess baseline factors associated with dual method use at 12 months among 1,194 women who were sexually active in the past 30 days.

resultsAt baseline, 36% were condom users, and only 5% were dual method users. After initiation of a hormonal method, condom use decreased to 27% and remained relatively unchanged thereafter. Dual method use increased to a peak of 20% at 3 months but decreased over time. Women who were condom users at baseline had nearly twice the odds of being a dual method user at 12 months compared with nonusers (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.28-3.14). Women who believed their main partner thought condoms were "very important," regardless of perceived sexually transmitted infection risk or participant's own views of condoms, had higher odds of dual method use (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.47-5.71).

conclusionsThese results highlight a potential missed opportunity for family planning providers. Providers focus on helping women initiate hormonal methods, however, they may improve outcomes by giving greater attention to method continuation and contingency planning in the event of method discontinuation and to the role of the partner in family planning.

Indexed as

AdolescentCohort StudiesContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptives, OralFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesSingle-Use Internal CondomSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultContraceptives, Oral

Identifiers

PMID23260838
PMCPMC3745283
OpenAlexW2136302249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.