ArticleBiophysical journal2012
Spatial and temporal sensing limits of microtubule polarization in neuronal growth cones by intracellular gradients and forces.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Model for Coordination of Microtubule and Actin Dynamics in Growth Cone Turning.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Neurovascular patterning cues and implications for central and peripheral neurological disease.Surgical neurology international · 2017Review
- Increase in Growth Cone Size Correlates with Decrease in Neurite Growth Rate.Neural plasticity · 2016Article
- Model of Growth Cone Membrane Polarization via Microtubule Length Regulation.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuronal growth cones are the most sensitive among eukaryotic cells in responding to directional chemical cues. Although a dynamic microtubule cytoskeleton has been shown to be essential for growth-cone turning, the precise nature of coupling of the spatial cue with microtubule polarization is less understood. Here we present a computational model of microtubule polarization in a turning neuronal growth cone. We explore the limits of directional cues in modifying the spatial polarization of microtubules by testing the role of microtubule dynamics, gradients of regulators, and retrograde forces along filopodia. We analyze the steady state and transition behavior of microtubules on being presented with a directional stimulus. Our model makes novel, to our knowledge, predictions about the minimal angular spread of the chemical signal at the growth cone and the fastest polarization times. A regulatory reaction-diffusion network based on the cyclic phosphorylation-dephosphorylation of a regulator predicts that the receptor-signal magnitude can generate the maximal polarization of microtubules and not feedback loops or amplifications in the network. Using both the phenomenological and network models, we have demonstrated some of the physical limits within which the microtubule polarization system works in turning the neuron.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.