Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23260043›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2012

Wanted: a positive control for anomalous subdiffusion.

Michael J Saxton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Synthetic Stochastic Motion Platform for Testing Single Particle Tracking Microscopes.IEEE transactions on control systems technology : a publication of the IEEE Control Systems Society · 2022
    Article
  3. Real-Time Feedback-Driven Single-Particle Tracking: A Survey and Perspective.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. High-Precision Protein-Tracking With Interferometric Scattering Microscopy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Simulation Best Practices for Lipid Membranes [Article v1.0].Living journal of computational molecular science · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Dark Matter of Biology.Biophysical journal · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Subdiffusive motion of bacteriophage in mucosal surfaces increases the frequency of bacterial encounters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael J SaxtonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, USA. mjsaxton@ucdavis.edu

Funding

LATERAL DIFFUSION IN AN ARCHIPELAGO: MONTE CARLO STUDIESR01GM038133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI SAXTON, MICHAEL J. · 1988 to 2011
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038133NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM038133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomalous subdiffusion in cells and model systems is an active area of research. The main questions are whether diffusion is anomalous or normal, and if it is anomalous, its mechanism. The subject is controversial, especially the hypothesis that crowding causes anomalous subdiffusion. Anomalous subdiffusion measurements would be strengthened by an experimental standard, particularly one able to cross-calibrate the different types of measurements. Criteria for a calibration standard are proposed. First, diffusion must be anomalous over the length and timescales of the different measurements. The length-scale is fundamental; the time scale can be adjusted through the viscosity of the medium. Second, the standard must be theoretically well understood, with a known anomalous subdiffusion exponent, ideally readily tunable. Third, the standard must be simple, reproducible, and independently characterizable (by, for example, electron microscopy for nanostructures). Candidate experimental standards are evaluated, including obstructed lipid bilayers; aqueous systems obstructed by nanopillars; a continuum percolation system in which a prescribed fraction of randomly chosen obstacles in a regular array is ablated; single-file diffusion in pores; transient anomalous subdiffusion due to binding of particles in arrays such as transcription factors in randomized DNA arrays; and computer-generated physical trajectories.

Indexed as

DiffusionCalibrationLipid BilayersNanostructuresReference StandardsSpectrometry, FluorescenceLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID23260043
PMCPMC3525842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.