ReviewReproductive health2012
Latin American women's experiences with medical abortion in settings where abortion is legally restricted.
Review in Reproductive health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Come on, Give Me the Pills Now': A Narrative Analysis of Reproductive Agency in Self-Managed Abortion in Argentina.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
- Staying in a punishing place: online narratives about pregnancy and abortion in pre-liberalisation Ireland.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Understanding the support needs and preferences of people who self-managed abortion with accompaniment group support in Argentina, Nigeria, and Southeast Asia: a prospective, observational cohort study.Reproductive health · 2025Observational
- Self-Managed Medication Abortion: History, Evidence, Models of Care, and Policy Considerations.American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Imagining Coat-Hangers and Pills: A Qualitative Exploration of Abortion Beliefs and Attitudes in Hostile Policy Contexts in the United States.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Quality of care offered by health care retail markets for medication abortion self-management: Findings from states in Nigeria and India.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- [Women's rescuers network: Community support for self-managed abortion in Argentina].Salud colectiva · 2024Article
- The chemical geographies of misoprostol: Spatializing abortion access from the biochemical to the global.Annals of the American Association of Geographers · 2024Article
- Aya Contigo: evaluation of a digital intervention to support self-managed medication abortion in Venezuela.Frontiers in global women's health · 2024Article
- My Health in My Hands: Improving Medication Abortion Knowledge and Closing Disparities with a Community-Led Media Intervention.Health equity · 2024Article
- Accessing abortion in a highly restrictive legal regime: characteristics of women and pregnant people in Malta self-managing their abortion through online telemedicine.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2023Article
- "I just have to hope that this abortion should go well": Perceptions, fears, and experiences of abortion clients in Nigeria.PloS one · 2022Article
- Abortion hotlines around the world: a mixed-methods systematic and descriptive review.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Review
- Abortion quality of care from the client perspective: a qualitative study in India and Kenya.Health policy and planning · 2021Article
- Abortion-related morbidity in six Latin American and Caribbean countries: findings of the WHO/HRP multi-country survey on abortion (MCS-A).BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Safe Abortion in Women's Hands: Autonomy and a Human Rights Approach to COVID-19 and Beyond.Health and human rights · 2021Article
- Perspectives on self-managed abortion among providers in hospitals along the Texas-Mexico border.BMC women's health · 2021Article
- Analysing the intersection between health emergencies and abortion during Zika in Brazil, El Salvador and Colombia.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021Article
- "Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Article
- Factors influencing abortion decisions, delays, and experiences with abortion accompaniment in Mexico among women living outside Mexico City: results from a cross-sectional study.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abortion is legally restricted in most of Latin America where 95% of the 4.4 million abortions performed annually are unsafe. Medical abortion (MA) refers to the use of a drug or a combination of drugs to terminate pregnancy. Mifepristone followed by misoprostol is the most effective and recommended regime. In settings where mifepristone is not available, misoprostol alone is used.Medical abortion has radically changed abortion practices worldwide, and particularly in legally restricted contexts. In Latin America women have been using misoprostol for self-induced home abortions for over two decades.This article summarizes the findings of a literature review on women's experiences with medical abortion in Latin American countries where voluntary abortion is illegal.Women's personal experiences with medical abortion are diverse and vary according to context, age, reproductive history, social and educational level, knowledge about medical abortion, and the physical, emotional, and social circumstances linked to the pregnancy. But most importantly, experiences are determined by whether or not women have the chance to access: 1) a medically supervised abortion in a clandestine clinic or 2) complete and accurate information on medical abortion. Other key factors are access to economic resources and emotional support.Women value the safety and effectiveness of MA as well as the privacy that it allows and the possibility of having their partner, a friend or a person of their choice nearby during the process. Women perceive MA as less painful, easier, safer, more practical, less expensive, more natural and less traumatic than other abortion methods. The fact that it is self-induced and that it avoids surgery are also pointed out as advantages. Main disadvantages identified by women are that MA is painful and takes time to complete. Other negatively evaluated aspects have to do with side effects, prolonged bleeding, the possibility that it might not be effective, and the fact that some women eventually need to seek medical care at a hospital where they might be sanctioned for having an abortion and even reported to the police.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.