Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23259607›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2012

Standardization and validation of a cytometric bead assay to assess antibodies to multiple Plasmodium falciparum recombinant antigens.

Bartholomew N Ondigo, Gregory S Park, Severin O Gose, Benjamin M Ho, Lyticia A Ochola, George O Ayodo, Ayub V Ofulla, Chandy C John

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic applications of microsphere-based flow cytometry: A review.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  6. Antibody Correlates of Protection from ClinicalThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Review
  7. Antibody Profiles toThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bartholomew N OndigoDepartment of Biomedical Science and Technology, Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya. ondigo2002@yahoo.com
Gregory S Park
Severin O Gose
Benjamin M Ho
Lyticia A Ochola
George O Ayodo
Ayub V Ofulla
Chandy C John
University of Minnesota · USMaseno University · KEKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

Northern/Pacific Universities Global Health Research Training ConsortiumR25TW009345 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KOLARS, JOSEPH C., NERURKAR, VIVEK RAMCHANDRA · 2012 to 2016
$5.9M
Malaria transmission and immunity in highland KenyaU01AI056270 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI JOHN, CHANDY C. · 2005 to 2009
$2.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW0080085FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009345NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI056270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiplex cytometric bead assay (CBA) have a number of advantages over ELISA for antibody testing, but little information is available on standardization and validation of antibody CBA to multiple Plasmodium falciparum antigens. The present study was set to determine optimal parameters for multiplex testing of antibodies to P. falciparum antigens, and to compare results of multiplex CBA to ELISA.

methodsAntibodies to ten recombinant P. falciparum antigens were measured by CBA and ELISA in samples from 30 individuals from a malaria endemic area of Kenya and compared to known positive and negative control plasma samples. Optimal antigen amounts, monoplex vs multiplex testing, plasma dilution, optimal buffer, number of beads required were assessed for CBA testing, and results from CBA vs. ELISA testing were compared.

resultsOptimal amounts for CBA antibody testing differed according to antigen. Results for monoplex CBA testing correlated strongly with multiplex testing for all antigens (r = 0.88-0.99, P values from <0.0001 - 0.004), and antibodies to variants of the same antigen were accurately distinguished within a multiplex reaction. Plasma dilutions of 1:100 or 1:200 were optimal for all antigens for CBA testing. Plasma diluted in a buffer containing 0.05% sodium azide, 0.5% polyvinylalcohol, and 0.8% polyvinylpyrrolidone had the lowest background activity. CBA median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values with 1,000 antigen-conjugated beads/well did not differ significantly from MFI with 5,000 beads/well. CBA and ELISA results correlated well for all antigens except apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1). CBA testing produced a greater range of values in samples from malaria endemic areas and less background reactivity for blank samples than ELISA.

conclusionWith optimization, CBA may be the preferred method of testing for antibodies to P. falciparum antigens, as CBA can test for antibodies to multiple recombinant antigens from a single plasma sample and produces a greater range of values in positive samples and lower background readings for blank samples than ELISA.

Indexed as

Antigens, ProtozoanAntibodies, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GMalaria, FalciparumMicrospheresPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GProtozoan ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23259607
PMCPMC3546950
OpenAlexW2031657955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.