Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23259040›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2012

Comparison of the binding and functional properties of two structurally different D2 dopamine receptor subtype selective compounds.

Robert R Luedtke, Yogesh Mishra, Qi Wang, Suzy A Griffin, Cathy Bell-Horner, Michelle Taylor, Suwanna Vangveravong, Glenn H Dillon, Ren-Qi Huang, David E Reichert and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Universal 3D QSAR Model for Dopamine DInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert R LuedtkeThe Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA. robert.luedtke@unthsc.edu
Yogesh Mishra
Qi Wang
Suzy A Griffin
Cathy Bell-Horner
Michelle Taylor
Suwanna Vangveravong
Glenn H Dillon
Ren-Qi Huang
David E Reichert
Robert H Mach
University of North Texas · USWashington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center · USMallinckrodt (United States) · US

Funding

Mapping the D2/D3 Dopamine Receptor Binding SitesR01DA013584 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI LUEDTKE, ROBERT R · 2001 to 2004
$612k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA13584NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS050658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported on the synthesis of substituted phenyl-4-hydroxy-1-piperidyl indole analogues with nanomolar affinity at D2 dopamine receptors, ranging from 10- to 100-fold selective for D2 compared to the D3 dopamine receptor subtype. More recently, we evaluated a panel of aripiprazole analogues, identifying several analogues that also exhibit D2 vs D3 dopamine receptor binding selectivity. These studies further characterize the intrinsic efficacy of the compound with the greatest binding selectivity from each chemical class, 1-((5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-4-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)piperidin-4-ol (SV 293) and 7-(4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butoxy)-3,4-dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-one (SV-III-130s), using an adenylyl cyclase inhibition assay, a G-protein-coupled inward-rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel activation assay, and a cell based phospho-MAPK (pERK1/2) assay. SV 293 was found to be a neutral antagonist at D2 dopamine receptors using all three assays. SV-III-130s is a partial agonist using an adenylyl cyclase inhibition assay but an antagonist in the GIRK and phospho ERK1/2 assays. To define the molecular basis for the binding selectivity, the affinity of these two compounds was evaluated using (a) wild type human D2 and D3 receptors and (b) a panel of chimeric D2/D3 dopamine receptors. Computer-assisted modeling techniques were used to dock these compounds to the human D2 and D3 dopamine receptor subtypes. It is hoped that these studies on D2 receptor selective ligands will be useful in the future design of (a) receptor selective ligands used to define the function of D2-like receptor subtypes, (b) novel pharmacotherapeutic agents, and/or (c) in vitro and in vivo imaging agents.

Indexed as

Dopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsDopamine AntagonistsHEK293 CellsHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3Signal TransductionStructure-Activity RelationshipTransfectionDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3

Identifiers

PMID23259040
PMCPMC3526968
OpenAlexW2042570040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.