Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23258968›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2012

Dexmedetomidine versus standard therapy with fentanyl for sedation in mechanically ventilated premature neonates.

Keliana O'Mara, Peter Gal, John Wimmer, J Laurence Ransom, Rita Q Carlos, Mary Ann V T Dimaguila, Christie C Davanzo, McCrae Smith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06067958 (Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Pain Management During Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06067958 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Pain Management During Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity: a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssaf-Harofeh Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsRetinopathy of Prematurity, DexmedetomidineArmsDexmedetomidine, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Population Pharmacokinetics of Dexmedetomidine in Infants.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Effectiveness and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Neonates With Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Use of Dexmedetomidine in Preterm Infants: A Single Academic Center Experience.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keliana O'MaraDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Peter Gal
John Wimmer
J Laurence Ransom
Rita Q Carlos
Mary Ann V T Dimaguila
Christie C Davanzo
McCrae Smith
Cone Health · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl for sedation in mechanically ventilated premature neonates.

methodsThis was a retrospective, observational case-control study in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. Forty-eight premature neonates requiring mechanical ventilation were included. Patients received fentanyl (n=24) or dexmedetomidine (n=24) for pain or sedation. Each group also received fentanyl and lorazepam boluses as needed for agitation. The primary outcomes were efficacy and frequency of acute adverse events associated with each drug. Days on mechanical ventilation, stooling patterns, feeding tolerance, and neurologic outcomes were also evaluated.

resultsThere were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the dexmedetomidine and fentanyl patients. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group required less adjunctive sedation and had more days free of additional sedation in comparison to fentanyl (54.1% vs. 16.5%, p<0.0001). There were no differences in hemodynamic parameters between the 2 groups. Duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the dexmedetomidine group (14.4 vs. 28.4 days, p<0.001). Meconium passage (7.5 vs. 22.4 days, p<0.0002) and time from initiation to achievement of full enteral feeds (26.8 vs. 50.8 days, p<0.0001) were shorter in the dexmedetomidine group. Incidence of culture-positive sepsis was lower in the dexmedetomidine group (48% vs. 88%). The incidence of either severe intraventricular hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia was not statistically significantly reduced (2% vs. 7%).

conclusionsDexmedetomidine was safe and effective for sedation in the premature neonates included in this study. Prospective randomized-controlled trials are needed before routine use of dexmedetomidine can be recommended.

Indexed as

dexmedetomidinefentanylmechanical ventilationneonatesedation

Identifiers

PMID23258968
PMCPMC3526929
OpenAlexW2046292522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.