Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23258576›Full record

Trial reportRespiratory care2013

Safety of an alkalinizing buffer designed for inhaled medications in humans.

Michael D Davis, Brian K Walsh, Scott T Dwyer, Casey Combs, Nico Vehse, Alix Paget-Brown, Thomas Pajewski, John F Hunt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respiratory care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05799521 (A Novel Nasal Treatment for COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05799521 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Nasal Treatment for COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled24ConditionsCOVID-19, HealthyArmsOptate, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Airway Thiol-NO Adducts as Determinants of Exhaled NO.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael D DavisAdult Health and Nursing System, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. mdavis35@vcu.edu
Brian K Walsh
Scott T Dwyer
Casey Combs
Nico Vehse
Alix Paget-Brown
Thomas Pajewski
John F Hunt
Boston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Virginia · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Exhaled Biomarkers of Pulmonary Infection in the Critically IllR00NR012016 · NINR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MONTPETIT, ALISON JONES · 2012 to 2014
$727k
Exhaled Biomarkers of Pulmonary Infection in the Critically IllK99NR012016 · NINR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MONTPETIT, ALISON JONES · 2010 to 2011
$132k
NINR NIH HHS K99 NR012016NINR NIH HHS K99/R00 NR012016NINR NIH HHS R00 NR012016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAirway acidification plays a role in disorders of the pulmonary tract. We hypothesized that the inhalation of alkalinized glycine buffer would measurably alkalinize the airways without compromising lung function or causing adverse events. We evaluated the safety of an inhaled alkaline glycine buffer in both healthy subjects and in subjects with stable obstructive airway disease.

methodsThis work includes 2 open-label safety studies. The healthy controls were part of a phase 1 safety study of multiple inhalations of low-dose alkaline glycine buffer; nebulized saline was used as a comparator in 8 of the healthy controls. Subsequently, a phase 2 study in subjects with stable obstructive airway disease was completed using a single nebulized higher-dose strategy of the alkaline inhalation. We studied 20 non-smoking adults (10 healthy controls and 10 subjects with obstructive airway disease), both at baseline and after inhalation of alkaline buffer. We used spirometry and vital signs as markers of clinical safety. We used changes in fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH as surrogate markers of airway pH modification.

resultsAlkaline glycine inhalation was tolerated by all subjects in both studies, with no adverse effects on spirometric parameters or vital signs. Airway alkalinization was confirmed by a median increase in EBC pH of 0.235 pH units (IQR 0.56-0.03, P = .03) in subjects after inhalation of the higher-dose alkaline buffer (2.5 mL of 100 mmol/L glycine).

conclusionsAlkalinization of airway lining fluid is accomplished with inhalation of alkaline glycine buffer and causes no adverse effects on pulmonary function or vital signs.

Indexed as

GlycineHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationAdministration, InhalationAdultBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBreath TestsBuffersDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug MonitoringExhalationFemaleGlycine AgentsHumansLung Diseases, ObstructiveMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBuffersGlycineGlycine AgentsNitric Oxideairway acidificationairway pHbufferCOPDexhaled breath condensateexhaled nitric oxideglycineNO

Identifiers

PMID23258576
PMCPMC7610037
OpenAlexW2144347190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.