Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23257981›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2013

Adapting human pluripotent stem cells to high-throughput and high-content screening.

Sabrina C Desbordes, Lorenz Studer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Breaking the mold: 3D cell cultures reshaping the future of cancer research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sabrina C DesbordesCenter for Stem Cell Biology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lorenz Studer

Funding

HTS Screen-Neural Differentiation in Human ES Cells(RMI)R21NS053655 · NINDS · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI STUDER, LORENZ P. · 2005 to 2005
$209k
NINDS NIH HHS 1R21NS053655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) as a source of cells for drug discovery, cytotoxicity assessment and disease modeling requires their adaptation to large-scale culture conditions and screening formats. Here, we describe a simple and robust protocol for the adaptation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) to high-throughput screening (HTS). This protocol can also be adapted to human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and high-content screening (HCS). We also describe a 7-d assay to identify compounds with an effect on hESC self-renewal and differentiation. This assay can be adapted to a variety of applications. The procedure involves the culture expansion of hESCs, their adaptation to 384-well plates, the addition of small molecules or other factors, and finally data acquisition and processing. In this protocol, the optimal number of hESCs plated in 384-well plates has been adapted to HTS/HCS assays of 7 d.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCollagenDrug CombinationsEmbryonic Stem CellsFlow CytometryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansKaryotypingLamininMicePluripotent Stem CellsProteoglycansSmall Molecule LibrariesCollagenDrug CombinationsLamininmatrigelProteoglycansSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID23257981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.