Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23257905›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2013

Chemical probing of glycans in cells and organisms.

Sara H Rouhanifard, Lars Ulrik Nordstrøm, Tianqing Zheng, Peng Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Chemical Glycoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. CHoMP: a chemoenzymatic histology method using clickable probes.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2014
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara H RouhanifardDepartment of Biochemistry, Yeshiva University, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Lars Ulrik Nordstrøm
Tianqing Zheng
Peng Wu
Yeshiva University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Chemical Tools for Studying Fucosylated GlycansR01GM093282 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WU, PENG · 2010 to 2019
$3.4M
Applications of Click Chemistry in GlycobiologyR00GM080585 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI WU, PENG · 2009 to 2011
$740k
Applications of Click Chemistry in GlycobiologyK99GM080585 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WU, PENG · 2007 to 2008
$180k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM080585NIGMS NIH HHS GM093282NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM080585NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM080585NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the four major building blocks of life, glycans play essential roles in numerous physiological and pathological processes. Due to their non-templated biosynthesis, advances towards elucidating the molecular details of glycan functions are relatively slow compared with the pace of protein and nucleic acid research. Over the past 30 years, chemical tools have emerged as powerful allies to genetics and molecular biology in the study of glycans in their native environment. This tutorial review will provide an overview of the recent technological developments in the field, as well as the progress in the application of these techniques to probe glycans in cells and organisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansClick ChemistryDrug CarriersFluorescent DyesGlycoproteinsMycobacterium tuberculosisOptical ImagingPolysaccharidesDrug CarriersFluorescent DyesGlycoproteinsPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID23257905
PMCPMC3641795
OpenAlexW2031858174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.