Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23257609›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2013

Platelet-function testing in patients undergoing neurovascular procedures: caught between a rock and a hard place.

J Comin, D F Kallmes

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm Management: A New Standard of Care.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016
    Article
  10. Critical Care of Brain Reperfusion.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms.Stroke research and treatment · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J CominSt Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.
D F Kallmes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of neurointerventional procedures, clopidogrel hyper-responsiveness has been associated with hemorrhage; on the other hand, clopidogrel resistance has been associated with thromboembolism. This might seem to make a compelling argument in favor of routine platelet testing. Our reading of the literature leads us to conclude that routine platelet testing in neurointerventional procedures is not, unfortunately, ready for prime time.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceCerebral HemorrhageClopidogrelEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMalePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsStentsThromboembolismTiclopidineClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID23257609
PMCPMC7964478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.