Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23257166›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2014

Differential effects of the computer-tailored FATaintPHAT programme on dietary behaviours according to sociodemographic, cognitive and home environmental factors.

Nicole P M Ezendam, Johannes Brug, Johannes Burg, Gerard Borsboom, Pepijn van Empelen, Anke Oenema

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole P M Ezendam1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes Brug
Johannes Burg3 EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerard Borsboom1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pepijn van Empelen4 TNO Life Style, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anke Oenema5 Department of Health Education and Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore whether the effects on dietary behaviours of a computer-tailored intervention aimed to prevent excessive weight gain among adolescents, FATaintPHAT, were moderated by sociodemographic, cognitive and home environmental factors.

designA two-group cluster randomized trial. Potential moderation of the outcome measures (consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, snacks, fruits and vegetables) was studied by gender, education level, ethnicity, awareness of risk behaviour, intention and home availability.

settingTwenty schools in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Students (n 883) aged 12-13 years.

resultsOf the twenty-four interactions tested, only three were significant. The intervention effect on sugar-sweetened beverages was moderated by level of education (P = 0·009); intervention effects were found only among academic preparatory students. The intervention effects on fruit and vegetable intake were moderated by awareness of fruit intake (P < 0·001) and home availability of vegetables (P = 0·007); an effect on fruit intake was found only among students who were aware of their low fruit intake at baseline and an effect on vegetable consumption was found only among students who reported that vegetables were always available at their home.

conclusionsThe effects of the intervention generally did not differ between sociodemographic subgroups. The moderation by home availability illustrates that the environment may influence the effects of educational interventions.

Indexed as

CognitionDietFeeding BehaviorHealth EducationAdolescentBeveragesBody WeightChildCluster AnalysisEnvironmentFemaleFruitHumansMaleNetherlandsSchoolsSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID23257166
PMCPMC10282463
OpenAlexW2104350483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.