Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23256751›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2013

The gate that governs sulfotransferase selectivity.

Ian Cook, Ting Wang, Steven C Almo, Jungwook Kim, Charles N Falany, Thomas S Leyh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enzyme Kinetics of PAPS-Sulfotransferase.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Allosteres to regulate neurotransmitter sulfonation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ian CookDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461-1926, USA.
Ting Wang
Steven C Almo
Jungwook Kim
Charles N Falany
Thomas S Leyh
University of Alabama · USBipar · FR

Funding

SULFATE ADENYLATION-BIOCHEMISTRY &ENZYMOLOGYR01GM054469 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI LEYH, THOMAS S. · 1995 to 2011
$4.7M
HUMAN CYTOSOLIC SULFOTRANSFERASESR01GM038953 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FALANY, CHARLES N · 1992 to 2013
$3.3M
OROTATE PHOSPHORIBOSYLTRANSFERASE--STRUCTURE &MECHANISMR01GM048623 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI GRUBMEYER, CHARLES T. · 1992 to 2005
$2.4M
HUMAN PLATELET PHENOL SULFOTRANSFERASESR29GM038953 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FALANY, CHARLES N · 1987 to 1991
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM38953NIGMS NIH HHS GM48623NIGMS NIH HHS GM54469NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038953NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048623NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cytosolic sulfotransferases (SULTs) transfer the sulfuryl moiety (-SO(3)) from activated sulfate [3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS)] to the hydroxyls and primary amines of numerous metabolites, drugs, and xenobiotics. Receipt of the sulfuryl group often radically alters acceptor-target interactions. How these enzymes select particular substrates from the hundreds of candidates in a complex cytosol remains an important question. Recent work reveals PAPS binding causes SULT2A1 to undergo an isomerization that controls selectivity by constricting the opening through which acceptors must pass to enter the active site. The enzyme maintains an affinity for large substrates by isomerizing between the open and closed states with nucleotide bound. Here, the molecular basis of the nucleotide-induced closure is explored in equilibrium and nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. The simulations predict that the active-site "cap," which covers both the nucleotide and acceptor binding sites, opens and closes in response to nucleotide. The cap subdivides into nucleotide and acceptor halves whose motions, while coupled, exhibit an independence that can explain the isomerization. In silico weakening of electrostatic interactions between the cap and base of the active site causes the acceptor half of the cap to open and close while the nucleotide lid remains shut. Simulations predict that SULT1A1, the most abundant SULT in human liver, will utilize a similar selection mechanism. This prediction is tested using fulvestrant, an anti-estrogen too large to pass through the closed pore, and estradiol, which is not restricted by closure. Equilibrium and pre-steady-state binding studies confirm that SULT1A1 undergoes a nucleotide-induced isomerzation that controls substrate selection.

Indexed as

ArylsulfotransferaseCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleotidesProtein ConformationSubstrate SpecificityArylsulfotransferaseNucleotidesSULT1A1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23256751
PMCPMC3549632
OpenAlexW2091887476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.