ArticleCellular reprogramming2013
Effects of donor fibroblast cell type and transferred cloned embryo number on the efficiency of pig cloning.
Article in Cellular reprogramming, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing the Production Efficiency of Cloned Pigs: A Large-Scale Retrospective Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Identification of Important Factors Causing Developmental Arrest in Cloned Pig Embryos by Embryo Biopsy Combined with Microproteomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Supplementation of SDF1 during Pig Oocyte In Vitro Maturation Improves Subsequent Embryo Development.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Melatonin promotes the development of sheep transgenic cloned embryos by protecting donor and recipient cells.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2022Article
- Improving porcine SCNT efficiency by selecting donor cells size.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2021Article
- Locus-specific analysis of DNA methylation patterns in cloned and in vitro fertilized porcine embryos.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2020Article
- Efficient deletion of LoxP-flanked selectable marker genes from the genome of transgenic pigs by an engineered Cre recombinase.Transgenic research · 2020Article
- Generation of Transgenic Cloned Buffalo Embryos Harboring the EGFP Gene in the Y Chromosome Using CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Integration.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Characterization and comparative analyses of transcriptomes of cloned andBiology open · 2019Article
- Rescuing ocular development in an anophthalmic pig by blastocyst complementation.EMBO molecular medicine · 2018Article
- Identification of SSEA-1 expressing enhanced reprogramming (SEER) cells in porcine embryonic fibroblasts.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2017Article
- Influences of somatic donor cell sex onAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2017Article
- Chimerism in piglets developed from aggregated cloned embryos.FEBS open bio · 2016Article
- Ovulation Statuses of Surrogate Gilts Are Associated with the Efficiency of Excellent Pig Cloning.PloS one · 2015Article
- Trichostatin A-mediated epigenetic transformation of adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells biases the in vitro developmental capability, quality, and pluripotency extent of porcine cloned embryos.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Article
- Pig transgenesis by piggyBac transposition in combination with somatic cell nuclear transfer.Transgenic research · 2013Article
- Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are an attractive donor cell type for production of cloned pigs as well as genetically modified cloned pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer.Cellular reprogramming · 2013Article
- Factors influencing the efficiency of generating genetically engineered pigs by nuclear transfer: multi-factorial analysis of a large data set.BMC biotechnology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, cloning efficiency in pigs is very low. Donor cell type and number of cloned embryos transferred to an individual surrogate are two major factors that affect the successful rate of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in pigs. This study aimed to compare the influence of different donor fibroblast cell types and different transferred embryo numbers on recipients' pregnancy rate and delivery rate, the average number of total clones born, clones born alive and clones born healthy per litter, and the birth rate of healthy clones (=total number of healthy cloned piglets born /total number of transferred cloned embryos). Three types of donor fibroblasts were tested in large-scale production of cloned pigs, including fetal fibroblasts (FFBs) from four genetically similar Western swine breeds of Pietrain (P), Duroc (D), Landrace (L), and Yorkshire (Y), which are referred to as P,D,LY-FFBs, adult fibroblasts (AFBs) from the same four breeds, which are designated P,D,L,Y-AFBs, and AFBs from a Chinese pig breed of Laiwu (LW), which is referred to as LW-AFBs. Within each donor fibroblast cell type group, five transferred cloned embryo number groups were tested. In each embryo number group, 150-199, 200-249, 250-299, 300-349, or 350-450 cloned embryos were transferred to each individual recipient sow. For the entire experiment, 92,005 cloned embryos were generated from nearly 115,000 matured oocytes and transferred to 328 recipients; in total, 488 cloned piglets were produced. The results showed that the mean clones born healthy per litter resulted from transfer of embryos cloned from LW-AFBs (2.53 ± 0.34) was similar with that associated with P,D,L,Y-FFBs (2.72 ± 0.29), but was significantly higher than that resulted from P,D,L,Y-AFBs (1.47 ± 0.18). Use of LW-AFBs as donor cells for SCNT resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy rate (72.00% vs. 59.30% and 48.11%) and delivery rate (60.00% vs. 45.93% and 35.85%) for cloned embryo recipients, and a significantly higher birth rate of healthy clones (0.5009% vs. 0.3362% and 0.2433%) than that resulting from P,D,L,Y-AFBs and P,D,L,Y-FFBs. This suggests that using LW-AFBs as donor cells results in a higher cloning efficiency in pigs, compared with the other two donor fibroblast cell types. The birth rate of healthy clones was significantly improved when the number of transferred cloned embryos was increased from 150-199 to 200-450 per recipient. However, increase of the number of transferred embryos from 200-249 to 250-450 per surrogate did not change the birth rate of healthy clones. This suggests that transfer of excessive (250-450) cloned embryos to an individual surrogate is not necessary for increasing the cloning efficiency in pigs, and the relatively optimal number of reconstructed embryos transferred to individual recipient is 200-249. Furthermore, our results indicated that the numbers of total born clones, clones born alive, and clones born healthy per litter have a significantly high positive correlation with each other. The present study provides useful information for improving SCNT efficiency in pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.