Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23255878›Full record

SynthesisGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2012

German S3-Guideline: rectovaginal fistula.

Andreas Ommer, Alexander Herold, Eugen Berg, Alois Fürst, Thomas Schiedeck, Marco Sailer

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A fully transanal endoscopic approach for large post-anastomotic high rectovaginal fistulas: An IDEAL stage 1 technical note.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Martius flap in recurrent rectovaginal fistula: a video vignette.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Local skin flap procedure for repair of rectovaginal fistula: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022
    Article
  16. Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of rectovaginal fistula.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas OmmerEnd- und Dickdarmpraxis, Essen, Germany. aommer@online.de
Alexander Herold
Eugen Berg
Alois Fürst
Thomas Schiedeck
Marco Sailer
Deutsches Institut für Normung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectovaginal fistulas are rare, and the majority is of traumatic origin. The most common causes are obstetric trauma, local infection, and rectal surgery. This guideline does not cover rectovaginal fistulas that are caused by chronic inflammatory bowel disease.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was undertaken.

resultsRectovaginal fistula is diagnosed on the basis of the patient history and the clinical examination. Other pathologies should be ruled out by endoscopy, endosonography or tomography. The assessment of sphincter function is valuable for surgical planning (potential simultaneous sphincter reconstruction). Persistent rectovaginal fistulas generally require surgical treatment. Various surgical procedures have been described. The most common procedure involves a transrectal approach with endorectal suture. The transperineal approach is primarily used in case of simultaneous sphincter reconstruction. In recurrent fistulas. Closure can be achieved by the interposition of autologous tissue (Martius flap, gracilis muscle) or biologically degradable materials. In higher fistulas, abdominal approaches are used as well. Stoma creation is more frequently required in rectovaginal fistulas than in anal fistulas. The decision regarding stoma creation should be primarily based on the extent of the local defect and the resulting burden on the patient.

conclusionIn this clinical S3-Guideline, instructions for diagnosis and treatment of rectovaginal fistulas are described for the first time in Germany. Given the low evidence level, this guideline is to be considered of descriptive character only. Recommendations for diagnostics and treatment are primarily based the clinical experience of the guideline group and cannot be fully supported by the literature.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedColonCombined Modality TherapyEndosonographyEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRectovaginal FistulaRecurrenceGerman guidelineincontinencepostpartal traumarectal cancerrectovaginal fistulasurgery

Identifiers

PMID23255878
PMCPMC3525883
OpenAlexW127120740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.