Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23255357›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2013

Broad RNA interference-mediated antiviral immunity and virus-specific inducible responses in Drosophila.

Cordula Kemp, Stefanie Mueller, Akira Goto, Vincent Barbier, Simona Paro, François Bonnay, Catherine Dostert, Laurent Troxler, Charles Hetru, Carine Meignin and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 265 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hypertension due to financial mismanagement.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Insects · 2024
    Article
  20. Perilipin1 inhibitsMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cordula KempCNRS-UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Stefanie Mueller
Akira Goto
Vincent Barbier
Simona Paro
François Bonnay
Catherine Dostert
Laurent Troxler
Charles Hetru
Carine Meignin
Sébastien Pfeffer
Jules A Hoffmann
Jean-Luc Imler
Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRImmunologie, Immunopathologie et Chimie Thérapeutique · FRInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

Sequencing CoreP01AI070167 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BEUTLER, BRUCE A · 2006 to 2016
$27.2M
European Research Council 260767NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI070167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a good model to unravel the molecular mechanisms of innate immunity and has led to some important discoveries about the sensing and signaling of microbial infections. The response of Drosophila to virus infections remains poorly characterized and appears to involve two facets. On the one hand, RNA interference involves the recognition and processing of dsRNA into small interfering RNAs by the host RNase Dicer-2 (Dcr-2), whereas, on the other hand, an inducible response controlled by the evolutionarily conserved JAK-STAT pathway contributes to the antiviral host defense. To clarify the contribution of the small interfering RNA and JAK-STAT pathways to the control of viral infections, we have compared the resistance of flies wild-type and mutant for Dcr-2 or the JAK kinase Hopscotch to infections by seven RNA or DNA viruses belonging to different families. Our results reveal a unique susceptibility of hop mutant flies to infection by Drosophila C virus and cricket paralysis virus, two members of the Dicistroviridae family, which contrasts with the susceptibility of Dcr-2 mutant flies to many viruses, including the DNA virus invertebrate iridescent virus 6. Genome-wide microarray analysis confirmed that different sets of genes were induced following infection by Drosophila C virus or by two unrelated RNA viruses, Flock House virus and Sindbis virus. Overall, our data reveal that RNA interference is an efficient antiviral mechanism, operating against a large range of viruses, including a DNA virus. By contrast, the antiviral contribution of the JAK-STAT pathway appears to be virus specific.

Indexed as

AlphavirusAlphavirus InfectionsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDNA Virus InfectionsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationJanus KinasesMaleNodaviridaeRibonuclease IIIRNA HelicasesRNA InterferenceRNA Virus InfectionsTranscription FactorsDCR-2 protein, DrosophilaDrosophila Proteinshop protein, DrosophilaJanus KinasesRibonuclease IIIRNA HelicasesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23255357
PMCPMC3538939
OpenAlexW2147294427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.