Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23254959›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2013

Serum C-reactive protein and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study.

Ming Xu, Minglin Zhu, Yinggan Du, Bibo Yan, Qian Wang, Cong Wang, Jinping Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms of C-Reactive Protein Gene with Susceptibility to Infantile Sepsis in Southern China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming XuDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Minglin Zhu
Yinggan Du
Bibo Yan
Qian Wang
Cong Wang
Jinping Zhao
Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in lung cancer biology presuppose their inflammatory origin. Thus, CRP is regarded to play a key role in the development of lung cancer. Nevertheless, this interesting hypothesis and the role of inflammation in tumor biology remain complex and incompletely sure. Meanwhile, the association between CRP and risk of lung cancer was not stable in many published results. This study was conducted to evaluate the association between serum CRP and SNPs in the aspect of lung cancer risks, in order to assess its possible diagnostic and prognostic importance. We conducted a case-control study of 96 patients newly diagnosed of lung cancer and 124 controls in this research. Controls were individuals matched to lung cancer cases on age, gender and tobacco use. In order to increase the statistical power, never smokers were matched to patients by using a 3:1 ratio, whereas former and current smokers were matched equal to the patients. CRP concentrations were measured using a chemiluminescent immunoassay, and SNPs were assessed at five loci within the CRP gene (rs1417938, rs1800947, rs1205, rs2808630 and rs3093077) as part of a Golden Gate assay. Logistic regression was used to calculate OR and 95 % CI for lung cancer. CRP concentrations tended to be in positive association with lung cancer risk in our research (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 2.11, 95 % CI, 1.66-2.91, p trend < 0.01). Although CRP SNPs were related to CRP levels, they were not associated with lung cancer risk. In combined analyses, we observed a significant interaction (p (interaction) = 0.02) that positive associations were suggestive in younger (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 1.65, 95 % CI, 1.02-2.67, p trend = 0.18) and older individuals (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 2.66, 95 % CI, 1.45-3.98 p trend = 0.42). The risks of lung cancer were higher with elevated CRP levels among former smokers and current smokers. High levels of CRP were associated with increasing lung cancer risk, suggesting that CRP could be used as surrogate biomarker of angiogenesis and prognosis in lung cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesC-Reactive ProteinFemaleGenotypeHumansInflammationLuminescent MeasurementsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsSmokingBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID23254959
OpenAlexW1996302441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.