Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23253945›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2013

Are there volumetric brain differences associated with the use of cocaine and amphetamine-type stimulants?

Scott Mackey, Martin Paulus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in rat: Whole-brain spatiotemporal analysis with [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Psychostimulants and social behaviors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Alcohol use and interoception - A narrative review.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott MackeyDept. Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States. msmackey@ucsd.edu
Martin Paulus

Funding

Neuroimaging CoreP20DA027843 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SCHULTEIS, GERHARD G · 2010 to 2013
$3.5M
NEUROBIOLOGY OF TRANSITION TO STIMULANT DEPENDENCER01DA016663 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2004 to 2010
$2.8M
Negative reinforcement and interoceptive dysfunction in stimulant dependence.R01DA027797 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
STIMULANT DEPENDENCE: NEURAL MECHANISMS OF RELAPSER01DA018307 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS P20-DA027834NIDA NIH HHS P20 DA027843NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016663NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA016663NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018307NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA018307NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027797NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA027797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a large number of studies have examined brain volume differences associated with cocaine use, much less is known about structural differences related to amphetamine-type stimulant (ATS) use. What is known about cocaine may help to interpret emerging information on the interaction of brain volume with ATS consumption. To date, volumetric studies on the two types of stimulant have focused almost exclusively on brain differences associated with chronic use. There is considerable variability in the findings between studies which may be explained in part by the wide variety of methodologies employed. Despite this variability, seven recurrent themes are worth noting: (1) loci of lower cortical volume (approximately 10% on average) are consistently reported, (2) almost all studies indicate less volume in all or parts of the frontal cortex, (3) more specifically, a core group of studies implicate the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (including the medial portion of the orbital frontal cortex) and (4) the insula, (5) an enlarged striatal volume has been repeatedly observed, (6) reports on volume differences in the hippocampus and amygdala have been equivocal, (7) evidence supporting differential interaction of brain structure with cocaine vs. ATS is scant but the volume of all or parts of the temporal cortex appear lower in a majority of studies on cocaine but not ATS. Future research should include longitudinal designs on larger sample sizes and examine other stages of exposure to psychostimulants.

Indexed as

AmphetaminesAnimalsBrainBrain Damage, ChronicCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineHumansAmphetaminesCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaine

Identifiers

PMID23253945
PMCPMC3604030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.