ReviewClinical and translational science2012
Values in translation: how asking the right questions can move translational science toward greater health impact.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Quantitative Measures of Stakeholder Engagement.Clinical and translational science · 2017Pooled it
- Steps toward developing an algorithm to facilitate recognition of translational science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Article
- Efforts to evaluate translational science's impact on biomedicine and society should incorporate Science and Technology Studies (STS).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Addressing health disparities in the criminal legal system: Translational benefits, challenges, and facilitators of impactful research with incarcerated pregnant women.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2020Article
- Computerized Cognitive Training in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility and Satisfaction Study.JMIR mental health · 2018Article
- Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018Article
- Adapting the T0-T4 implementation science model to occupational health and safety in agriculture, forestry, and fishing: A scoping review.American journal of industrial medicine · 2018Article
- Reengineering Biomedical Translational Research with Engineering Ethics.Science and engineering ethics · 2015Article
- Mapping the Ethics of Translational Genomics: Situating Return of Results and Navigating the Research-Clinical Divide.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The speed and effectiveness of current approaches to research translation are widely viewed as disappointing given small gains in real population health outcomes despite huge investments in basic and translational science. We identify critical value questions-ethical, social, economic, and cultural-that arise at moments throughout the research pathway. By making these questions visible, and promoting discussion of them with diverse stakeholders, we can facilitate handoffs along the translational pathway and increase uptake of effective interventions. Who is involved with those discussions will determine which research projects, populations, and methods get prioritized. We argue that some upfront investment in community and interdisciplinary engagement, shaped by familiar questions in ethics, social justice, and cultural knowledge, can save time and resources in the long run because interventions and strategies will be aimed in the right direction, that is, toward health improvements for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.