Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23253453›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

Differences in enhancer activity in mouse and zebrafish reporter assays are often associated with changes in gene expression.

Ana Ariza-Cosano, Axel Visel, Len A Pennacchio, Hunter B Fraser, José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta, Manuel Irimia, José Bessa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Enhancer turnover and conserved regulatory function in vertebrate evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  9. Deep conservation of cis-regulatory elements in metazoans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Ariza-CosanoCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD), CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Ctra. Utrera Km 1, Seville 41013, Spain.
Axel Visel
Len A Pennacchio
Hunter B Fraser
José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta
Manuel Irimia
José Bessa
Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESJoint Genome Institute · USJunta de Andalucía · ESLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USStanford University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Generation of an In Vivo Human Genome Transcriptional Enhancer DatasetR01HG003988 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI Len Alexander Pennacchio · 2006 to 2026
$24.1M
Genome-wide discovery of allele-specific gene expression and chromatin statesR21HG005240 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, HUNTER B · 2010 to 2011
$435k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R21HG005240-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenotypic evolution in animals is thought to be driven in large part by differences in gene expression patterns, which can result from sequence changes in cis-regulatory elements (cis-changes) or from changes in the expression pattern or function of transcription factors (trans-changes). While isolated examples of trans-changes have been identified, the scale of their overall contribution to regulatory and phenotypic evolution remains unclear.

resultsHere, we attempt to examine the prevalence of trans-effects and their potential impact on gene expression patterns in vertebrate evolution by comparing the function of identical human tissue-specific enhancer sequences in two highly divergent vertebrate model systems, mouse and zebrafish. Among 47 human conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) tested in transgenic mouse embryos and in stable zebrafish lines, at least one species-specific expression domain was observed in the majority (83%) of cases, and 36% presented dramatically different expression patterns between the two species. Although some of these discrepancies may be due to the use of different transgenesis systems in mouse and zebrafish, in some instances we found an association between differences in enhancer activity and changes in the endogenous gene expression patterns between mouse and zebrafish, suggesting a potential role for trans-changes in the evolution of gene expression.

conclusionsIn total, our results: (i) serve as a cautionary tale for studies investigating the role of human enhancers in different model organisms, and (ii) suggest that changes in the trans environment may play a significant role in the evolution of gene expression in vertebrates.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsConserved SequenceDNA PrimersEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression RegulationGenes, ReporterHumansIn Situ HybridizationMiceMice, TransgenicSpecies SpecificityTranscription FactorsZebrafishDNA PrimersTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23253453
PMCPMC3541358
OpenAlexW2031977440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.