Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23252357›Full record

SynthesisExpert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research2012

Cognitive behavior therapy via the Internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Erik Hedman, Brjánn Ljótsson, Nils Lindefors

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 291 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
291citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03068676 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study Investigating the Feasibility of Implementing Internet-delivered Treatments for Depression and Anxiety in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorSilver Cloud HealthRan2017 to 2018Enrolled12ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, DepressionArmsSpace from Depression, Space from Anxiety
NCT04678180 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Clinical Study Evaluating the Treatment Outcome of Combined Virtual Tic Training in Children and Adolescents With a Chronic Tic Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorAarhus University HospitalRan2021 to 2025Enrolled31ConditionsChronic Tic DisorderArmsCombined HRT and ERP
NCT05395312 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Blended Stepped-care Mental Well-being Intervention for Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2023Enrolled360ConditionsMental Well-being, Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Wellness 1ArmsOnline blended stepped-care mental well-being platform
NCT06928428 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Metacognitive Therapy for Depression and Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Primary Health Care, Feasibility of a Blended Mediated Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion StockholmRan2025 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsDepression NOS, Generalized Anxiety DisorderArmsMetacognitive therapy, blended format
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

291 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Digital interventions in mental health: evidence syntheses and economic modelling.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

231 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik HedmanDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. kire.hedman@ki.se
Brjánn Ljótsson
Nils Lindefors

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) is a promising treatment that may increase availability of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for psychiatric disorders and other clinical problems. The main objective of this study was to determine the applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ICBT. The authors conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials investigating CBT delivered via the internet for adult patient populations. Searches to identify studies investigating cost-effectiveness of ICBT were also conducted. Evidence status for each clinical application was determined using the American Psychologist Association criteria for empirically supported treatments. Of 1104 studies reviewed, 108 met criteria for inclusion, of which 103 reported on clinical efficacy and eight on cost-effectiveness. Results showed that ICBT has been tested for 25 different clinical disorders, whereas most randomized controlled trials have been aimed at depression, anxiety disorders and chronic pain. Internet-based treatments for depression, social phobia and panic disorder were classified as well-established, that is, meeting the highest level of criteria for evidence. Effect sizes were large in the treatment of depression, anxiety disorders, severe health anxiety, irritable bowel syndrome, female sexual dysfunction, eating disorders, cannabis use and pathological gambling. For other clinical problems, effect sizes were small to moderate. Comparison to conventional CBT showed that ICBT produces equivalent effects. Cost-effectiveness data were relatively scarce but suggested that ICBT has more than 50% probability of being cost effective compared with no treatment or to conventional CBT when willingness to pay for an additional improvement is zero. Although ICBT is a promising treatment option for several disorders, it can only be regarded as a well-established treatment for depression, panic disorder and social phobia. It seems that ICBT is as effective as conventional CBT for respective clinical disorder, that is, if conventional CBT works then ICBT works. The large effects and the limited therapist time required suggest that the treatment is highly cost effective for well-established indications.

Indexed as

InternetAdultChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23252357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.