Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23251526›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Advancing optical imaging for breast margin assessment: an analysis of excisional time, cautery, and patent blue dye on underlying sources of contrast.

Torre M Bydlon, William T Barry, Stephanie A Kennedy, J Quincy Brown, Jennifer E Gallagher, Lee G Wilke, Joseph Geradts, Nimmi Ramanujam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative multispectralBiomedical optics express · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing Absorption Coefficient of Hemoglobin in the Breast Phantom Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The importance of surgical margins in breast cancer.Journal of surgical oncology · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Torre M BydlonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
William T Barry
Stephanie A Kennedy
J Quincy Brown
Jennifer E Gallagher
Lee G Wilke
Joseph Geradts
Nimmi Ramanujam

Funding

Pilot Project for the DTMI CRA ProgramUL1RR024128 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT M · 2006 to 2010
$48.1M
A Novel Optical Spectral Imaging System for Rapid Imaging of Breast Tumor MarginsR01EB011574 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RAMANUJAM, NIRMALA · 2011 to 2015
$4.9M
Optical surveillance of tumor margins in patients undergoing breast conserving suR41CA128160 · NCI · ZENALUX BIOMEDICAL, INC. · PI RAMANUJAM, NIRMALA, YU, BING · 2007 to 2007
$196k
NCI NIH HHS 1R41CA128160-01NCI NIH HHS R41 CA128160NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR024128-01NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024128NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB011574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is a recommended treatment for breast cancer patients where the goal is to remove the tumor and a surrounding rim of normal tissue. Unfortunately, a high percentage of patients return for additional surgeries to remove all of the cancer. Post-operative pathology is the gold standard for evaluating BCS margins but is limited due to the amount of tissue that can be sampled. Frozen section analysis and touch-preparation cytology have been proposed to address the surgical needs but also have sampling limitations. These issues represent an unmet clinical need for guidance in resecting malignant tissue intra-operatively and for pathological sampling. We have developed a quantitative spectral imaging device to examine margins intra-operatively. The context in which this technology is applied (intra-operative or post-operative setting) is influenced by time after excision and surgical factors including cautery and the presence of patent blue dye (specifically Lymphazurin™, used for sentinel lymph node mapping). Optical endpoints of hemoglobin ([THb]), fat ([β-carotene]), and fibroglandular content via light scattering (<µ(s)'>) measurements were quantified from diffuse reflectance spectra of lumpectomy and mastectomy specimens using a Monte Carlo model. A linear longitudinal mixed-effects model was used to fit the optical endpoints for the cautery and kinetics studies. Monte Carlo simulations and tissue mimicking phantoms were used for the patent blue dye experiments. [THb], [β-carotene], and <µ(s)'> were affected by <3.3% error with <80 µM of patent blue dye. The percent change in [β-carotene], <µ(s)'>, and [β-carotene]/<µ(s)'> was <14% in 30 minutes, while percent change in [THb] was >40%. [β-carotene] and [β-carotene]/<µ(s)'> were the only parameters not affected by cautery. This work demonstrates the importance of understanding the post-excision kinetics of ex-vivo tissue and the presence of cautery and patent blue dye for breast tumor margin assessment, to accurately interpret data and exploit underling sources of contrast.

Indexed as

CauteryOptical ImagingBreast NeoplasmsColoring AgentsFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalRosaniline DyesColoring Agentsiso-sulfan blueRosaniline Dyes

Identifiers

PMID23251526
PMCPMC3519619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.